9/11 crap again, what do you think?

[LateX'Dog]

No. If you think that is all there is to it then i hope you are just a naive teenager. Like i used to be.

I'm actually 29 with a 2 year old son and another on the way.

My life evolves around trying to bring my kids up.

Your post previous screamed of as long as i have my new toys i don't care what happens. I'm sorry.

 

[Fulax]

I'm one of those crazy "it's all the government's fault" libertarians, and even I don't think 9/11 was an inside job.

 

[Glaucus]

And what do you base that opinion on?

Absolutely nothing like most CT idiots.

Wow it didn't fall like other buildings, well how many buildings have you seen fall? How many buildings have you seen fall wich had the same construction as the WTC? What is your understanding off the physics involved.
Let me guess
None, none, nothing.

 

[LateX'Dog]

I watched if fully and to be honest I do agree that the way the towers fell was too uniform. I never quite understood how an impact from the jet could make them fall in such a way.

Does anyone have links of other respected Physics folk saying that it was perfectly normal?

http://www.ae911truth.org/

Might be a good start for you.

 

[oulton]

And what do you base that opinion on?

On the testimony given by thousands of structural engineers who said that the towers would never collapse in such a way unless a controlled demolition was staged?

 

[Robbo]

Me too. Cosimo and Robbo are sceptics to the core they will never change their opinions on anything 9/11 related as they have invested far too much into the 'Nananana not listening' bandwagon

I've listened to the alternative theories and in general they are not up to scratch at all, so why would I believe them.

Glaucus is quite well educated on this subject and has pointed out all of the holes in the conspiracy theories many times before.

I agree with most of what elmarko said, really.

 

[oulton]

Absolutely nothing like most CT idiots.

Wow it didn't fall like other buildings, well how many buildings have you seen fall? How many buildings have you seen fall wich had the same construction as the WTC? What is your understanding off the physics involved.
Let me guess
None, none, nothing.

You guess is wrong and insulting as per usual, as a remote sensing expert I have a fairly solid scientific background

 

[doodah]

I haven't really read up on it but the one thing I do not understand is the lack of damage caused by the wings, like so:

What's the explanation for this? Seems to be many conflicting answers and I can't be bothered reading through all of them on my lunch break...

It's the Pentagon, guessing it's quite sturdy.

 

[Danthus]

Bearing in mind how throughout history governments can keep virtually nothing secret, how have they kept an inside job hidden for the past 12 years?

 

[Danthus]

On the testimony given by thousands of structural engineers who said that the towers would never collapse in such a way unless a controlled demolition was staged?

One of the most famous claims, that termite was used has been dismissed.

 

[Yaayuh!]

It's horrible to think that i'm actually beginning to care less about it the more it gets brought up.

 

[Hedge]

And what do you base that opinion on?

I'll be honest. I base it purely on seeing buildings being demolished. Blocks of flats and cooling towers etc. I asked if anyone had links to people explaining it's perfectly normal for a tower to fall as they did because I don't have much faith in my reasoning

 

[Danthus]

You guess is wrong and insulting as per usual, as a remote sensing expert I have a fairly solid scientific background

Doctors have a fantastic scientific grounding, Wouldn't ask one their opinion on how to build a sky scraper though.

 

[Danthus]

I'll be honest. I base it purely on seeing buildings being demolished. Blocks of flats and cooling towers etc. I asked if anyone had links to people explaining it's perfectly normal for a tower to fall as they did because I don't have much faith in my reasoning

And how many planes have been flown into buildings so we can compare what happens?

 

[oulton]

One of the most famous claims, that termite was used has been dismissed.

dismissed by who exactly? Oh yes those people who said the carpets burn't hot enough to collapse a reinforced steel lattice structure designed to withstand multiple jet liner impacts?

 

[Hedge]

One of the most famous claims, that termite was used has been dismissed.

Termites? Lol.

 

[Danthus]

Termites? Lol.

Thermite:

Or maybe i am onto something with termites?

 

[Glaucus]

You guess is wrong and insulting as per usual, as a remote sensing expert I have a fairly solid scientific background

Rofl and this shows clearly why you shouldn't listen to people including those structural engineers. Just because you have some scientific background, does not make you an expert. It doesn't even mean you would understand the field.hwo many of those structural engineers have worked on a structure like the world trade centre? There expertise is in vastly different construction methods. That's where they are pulling their experience from. Unfortunately it doesn't stand up. Their experience in no way relates to the construction used in WTC.
And yes if it happened to buildings constructed in other ways, they wouldn't of fell like that.

 

[McGray]

I really do think this should be, at least, discussed on the internet.

 

[oulton]

Doctors have a fantastic scientific grounding, Wouldn't ask one their opinion on how to build a sky scraper though.

How to build a skyscraper? No but surely a doctor would acknowledge plausability in the testimony of thousands of structural engineers who

a) dispute that jet fuel can even create a fire hot enough to melt structural grade steel

b) argue that even in the impossible scenario that the steel got hot enough it would not go from full standing to freefall (full structural to zero support) instantly.
Steel girders do not behave in this way.