i cannot see how you weigh 101kg in all honesty
5ft 11 and 8 stone?
I assume you are a tall v.skinny woman?
didn't have a totally flat stomach. We have £1 for four Double Deckers and Corrie. And now I want a Double Decker.
Hmm I can't see it either, I'd say you look more 85ish.
You could have a high bone density, or maybe visceral fat. If you don't work out, are you still physically fit??
What's your diet like.
Doesnt look fat to me, could get some weight with muscle on the legs and it'd not show up so much as upper body does. Heavy manual work as a job?
D
Dude you're rude.
8 stone for that height is unhealthy, it will be showing of a set of ribs more then any abs
What gives?
5ft 11 at best
31
Waist size 36, can squeeze into 34s without a belt
Belly is not flabby but not exactly toned, just average
Fairly strong but not more than average
Wear large shirt sizes, size 10 shoe if it means anything.
Fairly wide shoulders
Lazy as hell
Race: likely indian but not sure as family history is weak as i'm of Caribbean heritage.
Naked weight at home: 102kg, work scale and mates scale 103.4kg
The thing is, i weighed 100kg at 16 and was obese, fat rolls, many chins and size 40+ waist. Same weight 15yrs later and i'm not? Should i be worried? do i have secret man fat or muscle?
![]()
Taken not too long ago in Thailand, about 101kg, guy on the left obviously![]()
But on the other hand you always find out in threads like this that actually OcUK bucks the trend, most computer geeks apparently are muscular, not fat so BMI doesn't count...![]()
To be honest, I think that photo could be bit deceptive as you're wearing quite baggy clothes. If anything it looks like you fat is distributed all over your abdomen rather than being concentrated in a "beer" gut, possibly with quite high internal fat deposits which would also go unseen to a degree.
[FnG]magnolia;25252514 said:Are you, uh, are you wearing jorts?
Im actually somewhat well "toned"... would be the word![]()