Britain's "horniest" student wins cash prize for bedding three new men a week

**** the daily mail. They probably fabricated the whole thing just to throw some hate at students and women. And if she is real and did actually do it, does anyone really care enough? Is this really "news?"

I said it before and I'll say it again. **** the daily mail.
 
Last edited:
robgmun said:
Never said i hated Thai or any other women. Your a bit of a finger pointer aren't you? Just be careful of throwing stones, some of them might go straight up

EDIT - And whats this about associating me with rape? Like i said, trend very carefully

2nd EDIT - On second thought i think you've crossed a line here and i've reported you. You need to check yourself next time
Click to expand...

Oh do give over, you made your bed by talking liking a weirdo sex pest ;););););)
 
Its not 3 times a week though is it? Its 3 different guys a week so could be anything from 3 times to whatever she can manage
 
scorza said:
And yet she'd probably reject most of the blokes on this forum, which may go some ways to explaining some of the misogynistic attitude of a lot of posters in this thread e.g. immature comments about female genitalia.
Click to expand...

I think that would be more due to the disconcerting nature of suddenly having thousands of people add you on Facebook, which raises immediate safety/privacy concerns. Not your exacting standards on what constitutes a suitable male partner.
 
I don't have a problem with promiscuity, but advertising yourself on a shagmetonight type of website is weird. Furthermore, flaunting your promiscuity, and advertising it and being proud of it is crass in my opinion. Also encouraging it by means of a financial "prize" is also pretty infra dig. The problems with that advertising is that it normalises the behaviour, and is almost an expected, which i think is a shame.

By all means enjoy your fun, but shouting about it is pretty pathetic and attention seeking - which leads me to think there are underlying issues there.
 
robgmun said:
Never said i hated Thai or any other women. Your a bit of a finger pointer aren't you? Just be careful of throwing stones, some of them might go straight up

EDIT - And whats this about associating me with rape? Like i said, trend very carefully

2nd EDIT - On second thought i think you've crossed a line here and i've reported you. You need to check yourself next time
Click to expand...


He was right though uhh lol?

robgmun said:
I've told you this before. Only Chinese, Japanese and S. Korean girls.

I hate Thai and Philippine, the dregs of society exacerbated by the English white male obsession with going there and shagging prostitutes and lady boys :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
 
elmarko said:
Nobody said you can't hold an opinion on it, you are perfectly free to not want to get involved in that kind of behaviour.

To put it into perspective - I don't like oranges, but to project that personal dislike of oranges into thinking negative things about another person who does like them - is where I think a person becomes irrational.
Click to expand...

So why is it OK for you to judge person X - to call them irrational - because they dislike person Y, even though person X disliking them does no objective harm to person Y? Yet at the same time we're told not to judge this girl because her actions cause no harm?

If you allocate respect/disrespect based on things which cause no harm, or don't impact on your life at all - then I'm not sure how valuable that respect is as a commodity.
Click to expand...

Based on what you're saying it seems you respect everyone who does things that cause no harm. Everyone. You're handing respect out pretty liberally, there, and high supply means low value.
 
Fulax said:
So why is it OK for you to judge person X - to call them irrational - because they dislike person Y, even though person X disliking them does no objective harm to person Y? Yet at the same time we're told not to judge this girl because her actions cause no harm?
Click to expand...
This is a flawed line of debate, it's akin to the "I want to have the freedom to discriminate" kind of thinking.

Nobody said you can't hold these views, just that people will call you out on holding irrational views.

It's not rational to hold negative views about somebody for no justifiable reason, simply not wanting to do the same thing as them ins't a justification (as that's what subjective choice is).

Holding the view that women who are sexually active & sexually independent does have an impact in wider society, as our views determine our social judgements & our behaviour.

Fulax said:
Based on what you're saying it seems you respect everyone who does things that cause no harm. Everyone. You're handing respect out pretty liberally, there, and high supply means low value.
Click to expand...
I don't even believe in respect is a useful social construct - so no.

Freefaller said:
I don't have a problem with promiscuity, but advertising yourself on a shagmetonight type of website is weird. Furthermore, flaunting your promiscuity, and advertising it and being proud of it is crass in my opinion. Also encouraging it by means of a financial "prize" is also pretty infra dig. The problems with that advertising is that it normalises the behaviour, and is almost an expected, which i think is a shame.

By all means enjoy your fun, but shouting about it is pretty pathetic and attention seeking - which leads me to think there are underlying issues there.
Click to expand...
A few fair points & I agree, underline issues may be present.

My problem is with the attitude that it's somehow intrinsically wrong for a women to be sexually adventurous (equal to that of the average male) - the points you raise are perfectly valid concerns (as they are not drenched in clear misogyny).
 
Last edited:
Would smash with the force of 1000 Greek gods, just because I bet she's absolute filth

Tbh, if I was able to sleep with 3 different women a week, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Would I do it for £500 and a bit of infamy? No thanks Jeff
 
pitchfork said:
Please, women just have to be there in order to get laid.

There are fat ugly *****, there are no fat ugly studs.
Click to expand...

There are probably plenty of fat ugly studs; women are far less concerned with looks than us blokes so with the right level of confidence, a good personality, and an ability to not take rejection personally, fat ugly blokes can do wonders. The majority of them probably don't have the confidence though, due to being fat and ugly, and are probably scared of being rejected. Probably also depends on just how fat and ugly we're talking about.

I agree with your point though, it's much easier for a woman to get laid than a man... But for them, where's the challenge? :p
 
[FnG]magnolia;25310317 said:
I can't tell if you're joking.

I hope you're joking.

"Hang on future wife! Instead of learning about your life and understanding how you've lived it - what you've done, who you're friends are, where you studied, how many previous relationships you've been in, what your career aspirations are - as our relationship develops and I get to know more about you and you about me, I need you to go and sit in that room whilst I google you to see if you're an awful harlot. I'm worried that your hoo ha has been destroyed by rogue penises."

God, you're not joking are you? :(
Click to expand...

As if she'd share the information that she was a **** in the past, and wouldn't tell her friends to keep it quiet. Unless she's still proud of her "achievement" in 5-10 years time when she's looking for a husband, this is the likely outcome, some women are very good at keeping secrets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom