British. British. British.
As if our retaining some of our heritage is somehow not allowed?
Who owns it then?
The question you threw out there was is what is offered independence. The answer is clearly yes. The UK and the world is interdependent most especially economically, and I think you'll find that most nations including the UK follow political and economic alliances.
Keep our shared heritage, I wouldn't have it any other way. And I am even willing to accept that that's the main reason for keeping the monarchy, same as Canada, Australia etc.
But the Yes campaign are expecting to leave the UK, but keep the benefits of being in the UK. Which is absurd. It would be like the rUK voting to leave the EU but expect to keep free trade and movement. It just ain't gonna happen.
possibly the most bitter/misguided/insulting post I've read on this thread so far and that's going some - well done
You are misinterpreting me. This is not an attack on Scottish people, but Scottish politics and politicians. They are, in the end, no different to English politicians, or any nations actually. Criticising them will always lead to blame.
When Scotland falls into economic difficulties (and it will, all countries do) keeping the British pound, a currency out of Scottish control, will simply ensure that at the first sign of criticism will end in finger-pointing at Westminster. It would be silly to think otherwise. A very large chunk of the YES campaign boils down to little more than blaming Westminster for practically everything.
I don't blame them though. I live in the North West, and I blame Westminster for most of what has gone wrong here with employment, race relations and public transport.