Yes the point was to prove that the following post...:
...was a ****stained generalisation by using myself as an example.
Don't like people recognising your BS?
Don't post BS.
The wacky world of censorship
- Thread starter Mr Badger
- Start date
Yes the point was to prove that the following post...:
...was a ****stained generalisation by using myself as an example.
Don't like people recognising your BS?
Don't post BS.
They're not mutually exclusive you know... finding the censoring of pig's faces amusing doesn't preclude someone from also being opposed to some conservatives trying to control what we can or can't see on the internet.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,707
- Location
- North
This wont end well, I've had countless "discussions" with him where he posts inane dribble, you factually prove what he has written is indeed dribble, with him ultimately denying he even said that dribble in the first place and attempt to steer the conversation elsewhere or just post something offensive to side-track elsewhere. It's bitslice 101
He is best ignored, or laughed at for kicks, nothing more.
Call me ignorant and report me to the Dons, but we all have our views - you're entitled to yours as I am to mine. I read a bit of this and that. The Fail for rightards / comedy, Guardian for leftards, the Times (online subscription) for a more neutral standpoint, the Daily Mash for a spot of satire. Do feel free to signpost me somewhere 'more' reliable though
Why would I report you for being ignorant? I hope you're joking and not being serious there.
Also, people are not entitled to their views, they are entitled to an informed opinion, many of yours are not informed opinions.
With regards to the ignorance thing, I see you post a lot of ignorant stuff about religious people (I am not religious, to clarify) that it seems you've just not thought about properly.
The one thing I will not forget is that guy who was talking about his wife, when he said "(she's Chinese, FYI) and for some reason you got it in your head that her name was "Fyi", and it highlighted to me that you just don't see things for how they actually are.
It's nonsense because the woman is a fool, and due to her ignorance, thinks that Muslims find pigs offensive. It only takes a little bit of critical thinking to understand that, for people who believe in God, why would they find one of God's creations "offensive"?
As I've pointed out, the issue Muslims have with pigs is purely eating them, and it's the very same issue that they have with other animals that are forbidden from consumption as well. The only reason pigs have become this big issue is because it's a very commonly eaten meat, whereas the meat of other carnivorous animals is not commonly eaten.
It's not prohibited at all, which is my point. Some idiot objecting to a picture of a pig is an idiot and doesn't know much about the religion he professes to be part of. This is an issue most religious people have, they are idiots because they are idiots, not because they are religious.
People are hypocrites, it's not something that's exclusive to Muslims.
Nope, it's just sad that people choose to target Muslims, as if it's a trait that's exclusive to them, when the bottom line is that people in general are idiots.
It probably doesn't matter but absolutely nothing in that post implied I was talking about you personally, I had no reason to direct the point at you so I didn't.
I wondered what you were getting so irate about
Craterloads, you don't have "discussions" with me, you just defend a position by pointing the finger at some other group or you just make pointless "holier than thou" statements like this.
You are not Castiel, you are not clever than anyone else in here so stop pretending otherwise. You are in fact possibly the worst debater in here.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,707
- Location
- North
You mad bro?
I guess the truth hurts a little bit.
And I rarely defend a position as I'm usually calling out you on your "facts" and the bizarre statements you make
The point I prefer to make is take she was stupid simply because the religion in question was Islam, it being fashionable amongst the liberal and retarded to genuflect before it.
Had this been "Baa Baa Black sheep", she may not have invented a connection with black slavery and wet her knickers over what Clegg must think of her inherent racism.
Muslims are the new Blacks.
Vegans are equally derided, they just don't point to the big book of fairy stories to pretend it somehow makes sense.
Which in a modern world with better animal care, it just doesn't.
It's like warning people not to lick lepers because god said so.
Religion does attract a greater percentage of idiots though, if you can believe in the unseen then Mickey Mouse just might be a real talking mouse.
The issue with islam is the billion mass of uneducated peasants who can't tell when they are being wound up by some shyster seeking political power. Plus at it's heart it is a simple minded barbaric cult seeking world domination.
If liberal idiots didn't keep pretending this wasn't so, I wouldn't bother commentating.
Non muslim idiots generally don't kill people, it's a valid distinction I think.
That requires a counter point, you never make counter points, you just make personal attacks or avoid the question.
That's why you are rubbish at debating, nobody can respond to a personal attack.
I think Frightful Boar pointed this out a while back, nobody defends their position in these threads, they just rubbish a poster and think that's all they have to do.
Last edited:
It probably doesn't matter but absolutely nothing in that post implied I was talking about you personally, I had no reason to direct the point at you so I didn't.
I wondered what you were getting so irate about
Where did I say you posted something personal? I've used the word "generalisation" throughout. If you still go by your generalisation and think it's only me who "stopped to work out if any of it makes sense" then just further proves your incorrect stance and inferior mentality.
As I said earlier, you are demonstrating great difficulty in understanding the simplest of concepts.
So you're blaming Muslims for the way others choose to act towards them? Uh, okay...
Vegans are derided because of the attitude they usually have, the preachy, holier than thou attitude they exude, and the way they have to tell everyone that they're wrong for not being Vegans.
Evangelical Christians are derided for the same reasons, and you know what? So are Militant Atheists, too. Few people like those sorts of people, it's not the subject matter it's the attitude that they have.
It doesn't, you just don't need any sort of credentials to try and talk about religion, the entry requirements to lecture about religion are non-existent, whereas they aren't with other topics, like science.
This is an issue with people in general.
Muslim idiots generally don't kill people either...
Crazy people and or psychopaths are usually responsible for that sort of stuff.
The fact that he hasn't gathered the point you were making, kinda shows that he's somewhat similar to the people he's having a moan about.
These same people could potentially become victim to David Cameron's censorship crusade in the UK itself and still be frothing at the mouth about a blanked out piggy on the other side of the world.
Putting aside the fact that you could be opposed to both, David Cameron hasn't actually censored porn in the UK so your comparison is a touch weak.
Censoring pigs faces is pants on heads retarded which makes it somewhat funny.
I haven't portrayed any anger at all
(if you could point it out I'd be very grateful as it would mean I could be more tactful in future). And on the contrary, haven't you demonstrated an abundance of pointless anger at Muslims? or are you also admitting hypocrisy now?Are you trying to say that it is okay to get angry and generalise against Muslims, and wrong to get angry at a generalising buffoon?
Last edited:
No,
I'm blaming liberals for being liberals, where once they fell over themselves to apologise to black people for slavery (something which hasn't affected any black person for 100 years), they now fall over themselves to cater for a barbaric and misogynist islamic culture, which is about the last thing a civilised world should ever consider catering to.
Isn't that what the hijab is about?
You (westerner infidel scum) are not us, we will be separate.
Islam is a separatist religion, it makes no attempt to include others (OK it pretends to, then kills them)
Cameron "lets kill everyone!!!"
People "Err no, washing my hair mate, sorry"
Iman "lets kill everyone!!!"
Muslims "yes, death to the infidel!!!"
Nope, pretty sure you have to be muslim to have a jihad.
I'll let you know when the Methodists start getting upperty.
Killing people isn't a psychopathic condition, soldiers do it all the time.
Killing people because their religion (sunni islam) is ever so slightly different to your religion (shia islam) is maybe psychopathic?
At the very least it is retarded.
I'll let you know when the Methodists start berating the Anglicans on Twitter, who knows what horrors could kick off at the church fete.
Cake, everywhere!!!
Not angry over muslims, they do endlessly provide irritation or laughter though, always happy to point this out.
I do get angry over stupid fawning pussy liberal fascists though, they really pee me off
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,707
- Location
- North
Counter points are not required when correcting your numerous factual inaccuracies. Presenting facts is not a point. (for example when you claimed Germany was not a super power in WW2, or the French rolled over or Asians don't marry outside their own race etc etc)
Just a bit of advice, if a time comes where you have to use Frightful Boar to make a point, it's probably one that's best not made
Not my fault if you don't understand my posts, I do make an effort to make them clear.
I'm pretty sure he's consistently bested you in every thread (before you do the usual runner anyway)Just a bit of advice, if a time comes where you have to use Frightful Boar to make a point, it's probably one that's best not made
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,707
- Location
- North
Factual inaccuracies are as clear as day.
I would love for you to provide some examples? Hopefully this is not the same semi literate boar we are talking about that holds right wing views similar to yours (ah that's probably why)
Usually when people do runners from you is when you have dragged a topic so far off topic (usually due to being caught out) that they lose the will to live.
I would love for you to provide some examples? Hopefully this is not the same semi literate boar we are talking about that holds right wing views similar to yours (ah that's probably why)
Usually when people do runners from you is when you have dragged a topic so far off topic (usually due to being caught out) that they lose the will to live.
That's me right now.
See, another thread, no points made by Craterloads yet you've made six posts,
just lots of guff about how awful everyone else is.
/
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,707
- Location
- North
It's funny you actually think this thread is worthy of one where points are to be made.
Actually I forgot I am talking to bitslice who makes it his 24/7 job to show us all how bad muzzies are
Please, muslims only manage to look insane once a week, and produce priceless inanity like this only once a year. It's a perpetual clown circus of your own making, so don't make me a spokesperson for anything, I'm not even the OP.24/7 job to show us all how bad muzzies are
Unless you count the muslims torturing each other in Syria (not seen pictures like that since WWII), and the mega rich oil ME/GCC countries refusing to accept any Syrian refugees because... oh that's right, they haven't got an excuse have they?
Wow, doesn't that make the Middle East look really bad? muslims not offering other muslims hospitality, awkward
and muslims killing muslims. Funny how that's only an issue when westerners do it.
Last edited: