The other important point, was that if it is restated in the small print, you would need to leave the vehicle to read the small print.
You'd get nicked for driving without glasses I suspect, as I can read it.
The other important point, was that if it is restated in the small print, you would need to leave the vehicle to read the small print.
There is nothing in law that says a blue badge holder can park on a double yellow line. What the law does state is that they must be provided with an exemption in the traffic regulation order from the waiting restriction.
As I pointed out before remaining in the vehicle was not one of the "following conditions" to which the £60 charge applied.
Blue Badge holders can park for up to three hours on single or double yellow lines when there are no loading restrictions in place. The Blue Badge must be displayed and the clock must be set to the time of arrival.
As far as I know local authorities can choose how to enforce them. Many do by the following:
Oh and I'm fine, just surrounded by people (no inference to our OP here I hasten to add) by people who seem unwilling to take personal responsibility and I am venting it here.![]()
You'd get nicked for driving without glasses I suspect, as I can read it.
The other important point, was that if it is restated in the small print, you would need to leave the vehicle to read the small print.
You **** up, you pay it. You **** up AND they **** up, you shouldn't pay it. Quite simple as far as I'm concerned - if they can't be bothered putting in the effort to make everything compliant, then why should I be bothered to give them my money?
You'd get nicked for driving without glasses I suspect, as I can read it.
[TW]Fox;25773316 said:He has a point. The sign is poorly worded and implies that the charge applies if you contravene the 'following' conditions - the wording about leaving the vehicle preceed and do not follow this statement. There are no real conditions that follow except for the very small print which you'd need to leave the car to read.
He's coming at it from a strict legal perspective.
You can seriously read the small print on that sign under the crossed through P?
You must have bionic eyes.
[TW]Fox;25773316 said:He has a point. The sign is poorly worded and implies that the charge applies if you contravene the 'following' conditions - the wording about leaving the vehicle preceed and do not follow this statement. There are no real conditions that follow except for the very small print which you'd need to leave the car to read.
He's coming at it from a strict legal perspective.
Aye, I suspect there is a strong argument that a contract cannot be formed under such circumstances.
So where did they **** up in this case as I am failing to see it?
I suspect you're wrong, but to my point above.![]()
The BPA have a vast amount of rules for signage and enforcement that these companies must comply with to allow them to enforce these tickets. There's a multitude of other ways this ticket is non enforceable, but purely on signage, the text is too small, too ambiguous, too poorly worded, and there probably isn't enough of the actual signs.
One of my recent appeals was from a mcdonalds which was actually pretty well signed IMO, but after reading through some links sent to me by those in the know, it still wasn't enough. There has to be several signs, all easily readable from the car, there has to be clear signs at entry and exit, also readable from the car, and all signage must be completely clear and not open to any interpretation.
Basically, I doubt there's a private car park in the UK that 100% complies as the rules are extremely stringent and complex. I've lost count of the number of private tickets I've appealed and won, not to mention the council car park and bus lane fines. I've only ever paid one parking ticket out of probably 30+, you'd be amazed at how poorly these things are enforced.
From the OP's first picture I would definitely have to leave the vehicle to read that small print, I suspect most people would.
If you can read it from any of the photographs, what does it say?
As you say, based from the photographs. Hardly a good starting point.