• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

GeForce 750Ti – Runs Battlefield 4 Better Than PS4 & Titanfall Better Than Xbox One

Boomstick777

Boomstick777

Boomstick777

Soldato
Joined
2 Jan 2012
Posts
12,409
Location
UK.
According to tests, this low-budget GPU – that is priced at £100 and only uses 55 watts – is able to run Tomb Raider on High settings at over 60fps. Moreover, this card is powerful enough to run Titanfall’s beta at 60fps (1080p with 2xAA), something that Xbox One currently cannot achieve. And as if that wasn’t enough, the GeForce 750Ti runs DICE’s Battlefield 4 with perfect 60fps at 900p (PS4 runs BF4 at that resolution, though there are some slowdowns) and does an exceptional work at 1080p.
Click to expand...

http://www.dsogaming.com/news/low-e...tter-than-ps4-titanfall-better-than-xbox-one/

 
Both of those games were not made with the ps4 and xbox one in mind. I would expect when the real next gen console games come along the gtx750ti will not be able to compete. The ps4 has a faster gpu than the 750ti as it stands and then factor in the low level api the 750ti should not be able to compete. Bad ports to the new consoles are all that's showing in those video's.

Killzone 4 is about as good as it get's from the release title's but the pc does not have that.

The xbox one is being held back by its ram from what developers are saying. Once they find a way to overcome this problem they say things should move forward nicely. I won't be buying one though as i already have a ps4.
 
Last edited:
To be honest im not surprised. But lie people say these games are not optimized for the console.

But bottom line is the PC can always be more powerful than a console, but then it can cost a lot more.

I just wished that people realised how good gaming can be on PC compared to a console and lots more people did it.
 
I'm just hoping that now that the new generation of consoles are essentially based on the same architecture as PCs, that it will be easier for developers to optimise for both platforms without having to alter much of their code. If we start getting developers who are keen to optimise for PC (as they know it shouldn't be too much effort) then we could start seeing some games being released with extraordinary graphics on PC which don't run like dog poo.
 
PhysicsMan94 said:
I'm just hoping that now that the new generation of consoles are essentially based on the same architecture as PCs, that it will be easier for developers to optimise for both platforms without having to alter much of their code. If we start getting developers who are keen to optimise for PC (as they know it shouldn't be too much effort) then we could start seeing some games being released with extraordinary graphics on PC which don't run like dog poo.
Click to expand...

That's the dream....we can only wait n see. Im also hoping if some of the crowd funded pc games do well it will encourage developers to go with the pc.
 
humbug said:
"Mid level Desktop PC beats Games Console" well, yes :)

"GTX 750TI beats lower level R7 260X" again, yes. if it couldn't beat the 260X it would be a joke.

The similar priced R7 265 is faster than the 750TI

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7764/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-and-gtx-750-review-maxwell/15
Click to expand...

Keep quiet you!! :p

If any mods are reading this and the cryptocurrency GTX750TI thread might be better merged into the main Maxwell thread or the GTX750TI review one??

There are at least 4 concurrent GTX750TI threads already.
 
Last edited:
That's great performance but most of us here have gtx 770/780/amd equivalent
And those cream the 750ti
Please higher end models nvidia
 
Get one of these passively cooled and it could be an ideal card for a living room PC for light gaming. Low powered and quite powerful.

Something to consider anyway. Keep your power hungry 270X and let me be green :D
 
Gregster said:
Get one of these passively cooled and it could be an ideal card for a living room PC for light gaming. Low powered and quite powerful.

Something to consider anyway. Keep your power hungry 270X and let me be green :D
Click to expand...

The 270X might use 50% more power, but its also 30% to 80% faster. about 300% faster in some compute tasks.

The 270X and 750TI are GPU's in different leagues, its like comparing a 270X to a 290.

Other than price. they are priced in the same bracket ;)
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
The 270X might use 50% more power, but its also 30% to 80% faster. about 300% faster in some compute tasks.

The 270X and 750TI are GPU's in different leagues, its like comparing a 270X to a 290.

Other than price. they are priced in the same bracket ;)
Click to expand...

Well, when we look at it like this,

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-188-GW&groupid=701&catid=1914&subcat=1854

£120 for that 750Ti

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-328-SP&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1982

£144 for that 270X

You can clearly see that the 750Ti is the price performance king and you will save even more money, as it is far more efficient than the 270X. I always picture people who buy these cards as price aware and £24 saving is not to be sniffed at.
 
Gregster said:
Well, when we look at it like this,

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-188-GW&groupid=701&catid=1914&subcat=1854

£120 for that 750Ti

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-328-SP&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1982

£144 for that 270X

You can clearly see that the 750Ti is the price performance king and you will save even more money, as it is far more efficient than the 270X. I always picture people who buy these cards as price aware and £24 saving is not to be sniffed at.
Click to expand...

No it isn't. You do realise the GTX750TI is still a slower card,meaning it will have to be replaced quicker?? So over a few years you will be spending more in graphics card upfront.

KFA2 GTX660:

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-036-KF&groupid=701&catid=1914&subcat=2379

MSI R9 270:

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-245-MS&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1982

l5Zu4jv.png

FzYlaXA.png


Both around £130. R9 270 cards have been even lower for short periods.

The R9 270 and GTX660 against a GTX750TI which has been pushed to its limits?? Really now - so what happens when you overclock those?

Moreover,have you even run a midrange card??

My GTX660,H67 mini-ITX motherboard and a 80W TDP Xeon E3 1220(Core i5 2400) with an SSD and 2 HDDs consumes at most 200W during the combined test of 3DMark at the wall using an XFX PRO 450W PSU,which is Bronze rated.

My whole rig can run off a decent 300W PSU.

So if you had a Gold or Platinum rated PSU and an IB or Haswell based CPU,it would mean even yes.

That is peak power consumption. Usually it is around 150W to 180W at the wall.

Power consumption and PSU E-PEEN is only there to make people spend silly amounts on PSU you don't need.

PSU companies have made people gullible.

Anyone who is specced a rig on here will have at least a decent 300W+ PSU.

Moreover,I have run nothing but SFF mini-ITX and Shuttle SFF main rigs since late 2005.

You know the kind of rigs,where a 250W to 500W PSU are the most common??

I ran an unlocked 6800LE,ie,basically a 6800GT, off a 250W Shuttle TFX PSU with an overclocked XP 2800.

I ran a massively overclocked E4300,loads of RAM,multiple drives and an overclocked 8800GTS 512MB off a 400W Shuttle SFF PSUs on a blasted 975X chipset which drank power.

I ran a massively overclocked Q6600,loads of RAM,multiple drives and an overclocked HD5850 1GB at 950MHZ off a 450W Shuttle SFF PSUs on a blasted 975X chipset which drank power.

Plenty of people are running decent cards off 350W to 450W Silverstone PSUs.

The top end Valve SteamBox uses a Core i7 4770 and a Geforce Titan off a Silverstone 450W SFF PSU.

Those SFF PSUs are compact group regulated designs - they are decent for the size but not as good as full sized PSUs.

Thats just a few examples of what I have run in tiny boxes with limited cooling.
 
Last edited:
T
he R9 270 and GTX660 against a GTX750TI which has been pushed to its limits?? Really now - so what happens when you overclock those
Click to expand...
.
Who says btw the 750ti is at its limits?
http://www.overclockers.com/evga-gtx-750ti-ftw-graphics-card-review

It was mentioned by NVIDIA that the GTX 750 Ti would overclock to 1250 base clock without much trouble; and that’s exactly where it landed, while still being able to complete all of the tests in our suite. That might not sound like a lot compared to the 1189 MHz clock the card is factory overclocked to; but when compared to the reference clock of 1020 MHz, it’s actually pretty impressive. The actual boost clock landed at 1407 MHz when the GPU was overclocked to 1250 MHz. On the memory side, I was able to push it to an additional 200 MHz, which landed us at 1550 MHz (6200 MHz quad pumped). Nothing to complain about there either!
Click to expand...

seems most reviews find a softweare limit before the hardware one
Not saying its a great card but for what Watts :) it uses it is a interesting development and will be worth watching imo
 
Gregster said:
You can clearly see that the 750Ti is the price performance king and you will save even more money, as it is far more efficient than the 270X. I always picture people who buy these cards as price aware and £24 saving is not to be sniffed at.
Click to expand...

Gregster said:
@ CAT

You have taken what I said completely out of context and gone off on a tangent.
Click to expand...

No because the HD7850/R7 265,R9 270 and GTX660 are not drinking power. They can be run fine off under 400W PSUs.

I have one of them FFS. I can make the measurements myself and they are in line with reviews.

It isn't the price/performance king when DECENT R9 270 and GTX660 cards which are slightly pre-overclocked are £130. R9 270 cards have been even cheaper in the past for lesser models.

The HD7850/R7 265 have MASSIVE overclock headroom too. Hexus showed an overclocked R7 265 matching an R7 270X. In the same review they said it would run fine off a 300W PSU.

It does not change the fact the R7 270X also is significantly faster.

A std clocked R9 270X is between 20% to 33% faster in titles which push hardware.

So in terms of FPS/£ in next generation intensive titles,it is probably better value.

But of course if you overclock a GTX660 or R9 270 already you will get R9 270X performance,which makes the R9 270X poor value.

Plus the GTX660 and R9 270 are faster out of the box.

Plus you get BF4 with some of the sub £140 R9 270 cards with decent cooling.

Yes,I can see people saying buy the GTX750TI to "win" an argument.

Yet,the GTX750TI will struggle sooner in any newer title than many older cards,and that person will have to upgrade quicker spending more money over a 4 year period.

Of course the people who made the recommendation would have forgotten about it.


triss said:
T.
Who says btw the 750ti is at its limits?
http://www.overclockers.com/evga-gtx-750ti-ftw-graphics-card-review



seems most reviews find a softweare limit before the hardware one
Not saying its a great card but for what Watts :) it uses it is a interesting development and will be worth watching imo
Click to expand...

Yes it is at its limits since it is a review sample which AMD and Intel and OEMs always send their best off for reviews. You seem to not get just because a card can boost to a certain frequency it will be stable at that clockspeed even with greater power delivery or cooling. Even 1.4GHZ that would be a 15% overclock.

There are people who got 1.2GHZ+ overclocks on HD7850 cards,which would mean around 40% or thereabouts.

On HWBOT,the HD7850 gets 1125MHZ or an average 31% overclock.

But even then the R7 265 is under pressure from both the GTX660 and R9 270.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom