***The Official Battlefield 4 Thread***

biron_w said:
Conquest is my favourite mode. Which is why I find it annoying they have 32 player games in the server browser but no servers for them :mad:

*edit*
Or why not 40 player conquest? 4 squads on each team. Makes sense to me!
Click to expand...

Whoops 48 player servers were BF3, wouldn't work with the squad increase in BF4, so yes 40 would be more suitable!
 
biron_w said:
It's EA's servers. They are very well known for having utterly crap servers. People who are getting TitanFall are extremely lucky that the servers on that are Microsoft's and not EA's.
Click to expand...

Will be interesting to see how MS's Azure stands up to a large scale multiplayer.
 
Psycho Sonny said:
48 is probably the right number imo 32 would be too small for such large maps.

or they could just upgrade all the servers? that ideally would be the best scenario.

i won't be buying another FPS until things improve, that's why I haven't touched the last 2 COD's it also is a joke. (please no elitism COD used to be the number 1 FPS in the world back in the day)
Click to expand...

To be honest the next FPS I get will probably be Star Wars Battlefront, but that's ages away. Failing that, the division will likely draw me away from FPS's altogether.
 
The game is just junk tbh. It happens all the time. I have lost count the amount of times I have used a complete magazine into someone at point blank range for them to single shoot me with a pistol with %100 health.

Or 4 Javelin missiles into a tank and it is still happily driving about. EA/Dice should really watch this...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom