So Fluoride is a neurotoxicant?

LateX'Dog said:
Sorry, was the study not enough? Honestly, do you even read?

The discussion was about the study, the same one I posted. I don't have time to check the references.

So again, stop trolling.
Click to expand...

Well, you've freely admitted you've just posted what is potentially a load of rubbish written by a a nutter living in a trailer in Arizona, so he's got a point...
 
Oh here we go another crackpot theory. If it was up to these hippies we wouldn't be able to do or eat anything without getting cancer or brain damage. We may as well go to the nearest organic field, get down on all fours and start munching on the green grass. I'm surprised aspartame theories haven't been posted as well
 
AndyCroft1982 said:
Oh here we go another crackpot theory. If it was up to these hippies we wouldn't be able to do or eat anything without getting cancer or brain damage. We may as well go to the nearest organic field, get down on all fours and start munching on the green grass. I'm surprised aspartame theories haven't been posted as well
Click to expand...

Well to be fair you could hack up a cow and grill it, doesn't get more natural than that.
 
A couple of things:

1) One study does not prove anything
2) Fluoride may very well be a neurotoxicant, but one key part is missing, the dose. If it's only a neurotoxicant in a very high dose that practically nobody receives then it's obviously not an issue.
 
Since it is primarily a review of other studies you can't really comment without reading the relevant references. Also, unless your brain is in the developmental stage (ie. you're a youngster) you needn't worry.
 
Rossi~ said:
Looks as though it only mentions fluoride once in that document and doesn't say how much.
Click to expand...

Yup,
Vitamin C is toxic if you eat too much, so I'd assume anything the body wasn't designed to process is the same.

Oh and avoid the red stripes, that's where they put all the fluoride ;)
Blue and white are fine.
 
LateX'Dog said:
Sorry i didn't realise providing you with a study wasn't enough :rolleyes:

Seriously, just leave my threads alone, your like a stalking troll with nothing better to do.
Click to expand...

Of course fluroide is toxic.
At certain concentrations in certain absorption patterns.

Nitrogen oxide, NO, is a very toxic substance, a nerve gas, a chemical agent that will kill you, yet guess what, the body makes and uses NO as a neurotransmitter at certain cellular levels.

Oh the noes!
Muppetry abounds on GD, whatever will we do.
 
As an additional point, the placenta as stated doesn't block the transmission of everything, but it does prevent the transmission of fluroide.
So the sins of the mother are not passed to the debeloping foetus in this study. They don't make that point in their article, choosing a more general reference towards some of the items they are covering, but not actually investigating.
 
hrB7uGx.jpg
 
I don't see why they should add chemicals to our drinking water - people should be able to make up their own mind/choice.

However, it's more over dramatisation, just like they told us eggs are bad, fats are bad, and other myths surrounding diet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom