The reason marriage was invented was to encourage parents of children to live together and raise children together.
Wrong.
The reason marriage was invented was to encourage parents of children to live together and raise children together.
It sounds like you are not accepting the other sides argument enough to appreciate how it is discrimination. If someone believe marriage is only between a man and women and they think that is what makes it special. By removing the right of that person to experience that, he is being discriminated against.
It's a fair comment. Marriage is a religious affair. The religion they want to get married under doesn't accept gay. How can they even want to be married when they are already excluded from the religion anyway? Seems like the gay people are trying to force it on principle to ram it down the religious folks throats;, so to speak.
I love when people do this. It's so obvious.
Using the term "natural family" is supposed to give a sense that this is that natural and righteous way of life. There is nothing more natural about a more traditional nuclear family over any other type of family. Whilst it may still be part of an ever more dynamic social norm, nature shows that homosexuality and heterosexuality is prevalent pretty much everywhere.
Wrong.
No he isn't, he just needs education so that he's no longer ignorant.
I'm a married agnostic. It's not religious, it's legal.
The reason marriage was invented was to encourage parents of children to live together and raise children together.
AS gays can't have children, the original reason for getting married are not relevant.
The only reasons they want to get married is to feel more accepted and to get legal status, it has nothing to do with a family per se. This is where i come from with the argument about it diminishing the importance of the natural family. A lot of people don't care for the better meant of society as whole and only care about their personal interest.
You can move away from Firefox by using a replacement browser much easier than you can move away from Javascript.
It's not religious, it's legal.
Thats a failure of the state to provide a legal status akin to married but not religiously administered. Like a civil partnership.
Let's put it this way if 96% of the world's population was gay there would be no human population.
Why was it invented then? if not for the best interest of the children?
But it's not. So why the issue?
Well my point is that the fact we still have a human race tells us that gay is an abnormality and not the norm.
Well my point is that the fact we still have a human race tells us that gay is an abnormality and not the norm.
I don't think you or indeed anyone can give an authoritative reason to why marriage was invented.
Again, the assertion is based on absolutely nothing.
What a load of crap. It's important that children are brought up in a loving family, the make up of that is less important.
Of course we can. Marriage was invented so that children would be raised within the natural family environment. Its not rocket science. Only people who do not hold the natural family as important would come out with something so ridiculous.