• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Price aside GTX 780 or R9 290?

So this is it, your big list of AMD GPU problems? This is a thread about R9 290 or GTX780 and you bring in laptop problems as "proof" that AMD drivers cause hassle and need too many tweaks. :confused:

Same thing with people bringing in Frame Pacing or Crossfire problems. Neither of these issues are present on the R9 290. I have used CF 290/X cards on and off and all games are plug and play unless there is no profile. Same as Nvidia in fact, if you don't get an SLI profile it won't work or needs tweaking.

The OP asked about R9 290 or GTX780.

NOT Endure/Laptop
NOT Eyefinity or Crossfire

Yet the usual suspects are banging on the BS "Nvidia = plug and play and AMD is a complete hassle". I wonder how many current Nvidia issues I can find with a quick Google search. For the record I am not claiming Nvidia = hassle, just that it is easy to find fault if you go looking.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answers/id-2065764/driver-problems-nvidia-geforce-updates.html

Seems like a lot of hassle and not "plug and play"
http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/327414-nvidia-drivers-avoid-problems.html

http://forums.evga.com/tm.aspx?m=2142222

Ubuntu problem, but it's "proof" right?
http://askubuntu.com/questions/443818/problems-with-nvidia-gt630m-drivers

Anyone who spouts the "Nvidia = plug and play" BS is a troll pure and simple. I defy anyone here to claim they have never once tweaked their NVCP, or 3rd party NV inspector settings to get a game working better on their NV GPU.

I know they are issues with that particualr laptop and i am not saying they don't matter. In the thread you linked it mentions the brightness button not working because drivers not bundled with the laptop had been installed too. But it doesn't really apply to what we are talking about here which is plug and play desktop graphics cards.

And we have Greg's 69xx from 2 gens ago that needed the power to be turned up a notch, probably faulty memory?

Can't say i'm convinced that AMD gpu's are not as plug and play as nvidia yet. Considering i have both i think it's nonsense tbh.

Theres a fair bit of this going on in here. :D

JwIaEzr.jpg
 
R9 290 seems to have better performance but are Nvidia drivers really that much better?

So where I am looking are a KFA2 GTX 780 with a 1 year warranty for £320 or a MSI Twin Frozr R9 290 for £300 or a second hand R9 290 with reference for £235 :/

Out of those what would you decide? So bloody difficult!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

So I went with the second hand R9 290 for £235, they have been used for mining but I have seen others buy them and say they are great cards. Should be arriving on Tuesday so will look forward to playing with it! Might need to get a cooler though...

The 290P is a good choice, if you had gone with a 780 that would also have been a good choice as there is not a lot in it.:)

I can not believe this thread has taken 4 pages of debate.::eek::D
 
I have used mainly Amd over the years and its always plug and play. If it aint your fiddling or doing something wrong. 14 years of pc gaming and around 11 of those on amd. The only thing I found when going Nvidia was getting used to there control panel as I was used to the amd one. I played fps competively in the leagues with most matches resulting in a pause here or there due to people crashing with there stupid tweaks on either vendor. If you want plug and play. Buy from either vendor install chosen card and play games.




Post of the thread. If you're continually having to faff around to get games to run properly, you're either:

a) not a gamer but a faffer who pretends to himself he's a gamer, not a faffer

b) someone who doesn't know what he is doing.
 
Yes... and AMD were still fixing it in 14.1 beta. The stable branch still doesn't have a fix.

That was for the new line of APU's and discrete gpu's in a hybrid crossfire setup as well as GCN1.0 cards above 1600P.( multi monitor)

Frame pacing was fixed back in August 2013 for crossfire on resolutions up to and including 1600P.

Its never been an issue on 290 cards.
 
Heh. Had to tweak comps lots to run specific games, but it's almost universally a problem with the game not with the graphics card I'm using at the time.

No idea where the "AMD cards don't work out of the box" attitude comes from. Both have had issues, at the moment I've bigger problems with my nVidia setup than my AMD one but it's a laptop and they're a bit of a different ball game to desktop anyway. Generally I've had few problems with either in the past. I don't try every new driver that comes along as if the one I have works there is no point (unless I'm feeling like benching at that point in time), so I'm sure I've missed some broken ones from each side, but I really don't care.

If a more expensive card and a cheaper card were available for free I'd take the more expensive one, unless the cheaper one was noticably better. If they're similarish then the more expensive one is the safer choice as I can resell it for more if I so desire. So for the topic at hand I'd take a 780 over a 290 if price were not a factor at all. But then, I'm not after a top-end card from either manufacturer so I'd take neither were price a factor.
 
So this is it, your big list of AMD GPU problems? This is a thread about R9 290 or GTX780 and you bring in laptop problems as "proof" that AMD drivers cause hassle and need too many tweaks. :confused:

Well, somebody was asking about AMD vs nVidia in terms of hassle in one of the posts. That's what I was replying to. I wasn't going for a big list of AMD GPU problems. I was going with a list of problems I've personally had with AMD.

Now it's true I don't own a R9 290 and therefore haven't had any personal experience with it, but by that rationale, unless you own both a R9 290 and a GTX 780, you wouldn't be allowed to comment on it either.

Incidentally, I do own a GTX 780... and two 7970Ms, four 7950s, a several other AMD cards... but I'm sure the R9 290 is very different from all the AMD cards I've ever owned...
 
Well, somebody was asking about AMD vs nVidia in terms of hassle in one of the posts. That's what I was replying to. I wasn't going for a big list of AMD GPU problems. I was going with a list of problems I've personally had with AMD.

Now it's true I don't own a R9 290 and therefore haven't had any personal experience with it, but by that rationale, unless you own both a R9 290 and a GTX 780, you wouldn't be allowed to comment on it either.

Incidentally, I do own a GTX 780... and two 7970Ms, four 7950s, a several other AMD cards... but I'm sure the R9 290 is very different from all the AMD cards I've ever owned...

Checkmate. ICDP owns a 290 and a 780. :D
 
GTX 780 if you're a rich dork who doesnt know how to tune/configure your ****
290 if you enjoy more performance for less cash
Certainly seems there's an awful lot of clueless, rich dorks topping the Benchmark charts here, along with far fewer knowledgable poor persons who actually know how to sort their system out...
One chart is almost completely green and there's even a 780 in the Top Ten!

That's more the sort of thing that swayed it for me.
My AMD kit had done me fine, but this time I chose to go green. Something about pretty lights on the card, I believe... Meh.
 
Now it's true I don't own a R9 290 and therefore haven't had any personal experience with it, but by that rationale, unless you own both a R9 290 and a GTX 780, you wouldn't be allowed to comment on it either.

Checkmate. ICDP owns a 290 and a 780. :D

Okay. Then sure, under your rationale, you're now free to discard my opinion. On the flip side, you can no longer comment on hardware you don't own.

Good win :D

I don't generally comment negatively on specific hardware that i don't own. I've not said anything negatively about a 780 or Nvidia in this topic at least. I'm sure if i have someone will post about it shortly though. :D

The point i was trying to make is this is about a 290 and a 780. Issues that you had with a laptop card don't really seem relevant in the context of this thread. Certainly not enough to try and discourage someone from buying a 290 in my opinion. :)
 
Pair of 290s and a Titan. I think i'm doing something wrong because i didn't do any of this special tweaking to get them to work :eek:

In fact when i like you know play games with them! i can't really tell which system i'm using if i'm not monitoring FPS :D
 
The problem you're all making is that you're taking it as an absolute statement with two outcomes: works out the box or doesn't work out the box. Which is true when looking at your own experience in isolation but it doesn't reflect the statistical probability of having to make work arounds using card 'x'. For me, my 7950s were flawless when I had them running most of the time. CF and Eyefinity was a little bit messy when combined together but other than that they were alright. Skyrim needed RP to fix it which wasn't a problem for me but it's true that in that scenario the Radeons required more fiddling to get to GeForce standards.

I'm always by definition extremely sceptical about across the board statements but I think some of you are being a bit rude and aggressive to people with differing opinions which invariably are based on their own experiences. Some of the cries of 'if you had to do any fiddling you're a dunce' are a bit insulting but I'm hardly surprised the way this sub forum is going lately.
 
I have had far less hassle with Nvidia cards and the drivers and software is a lot nicer to use but I still keep buying AMD cards as well. They both offer advantages but if deciding between the two and cost is no object I would marginally choose the 780.

And then sell it a month later and buy AMD and then Rinse and repeat.....:)
 
Back
Top Bottom