By his side tbh, good decision.
lol
By his side tbh, good decision.
By his side tbh, good decision.
Didn't travel far, hand didn't move towards ball, no penalty
its like this in all the matches recently tbh
also i never get this "chelsea aren't playing football", I'm willing to bet when the sport was invented back in the 1800s it was closer to how chelsea play than how glamour teams like barca etc play.
No it wouldn'tIf it was at the other end it would have been an instant penalty...
If it was at the other end it would have been an instant penalty...
lol
it wasn't that much different to the one given against rafael. blatent penalty.
Now that was stonewall.Like at Stamford Bridge rite?
No it wouldn't![]()
If it was at the other end it would have been an instant penalty...
Now that was stonewall.
you'd have been crying into your roast spuds
It was totally different. Rafael moved his hand towards a slow moving ball and knocked it away. Flanagans hands were already up and were hit by a fast moving ball.
It was totally different. Rafael moved his hand towards a slow moving ball and knocked it away. Flanagans hands were already up and were hit by a fast moving ball.
They left Anfield a month ago crying
then he should know better than to have his hands up in the box. it was a penalty.
then he should know better than to have his hands up in the box. it was a penalty.