Prepare tin foil hats - no planes hit the twin towers

I'm not a CT nut by any means, but I know how corrupt this world is and I don't believe for a second that terrorists that we are told, acted out 9/11.

There are too many facts that don't add up. Same with the pentagon. So many things just don't add up. The plane remains just disappearing being just one tiny part.

Control and reinforcing actions through fear. It's been happening since before year dot. That's all god was "created" for, a way to control the people through fear that if you didn't you would be smited or some such. IMO ;)
 
What CT cretins simply don't understand, is that just because a corporation or government isn't totally accurate, gets stuff wrong, makes false statements or chooses not to share stuff the later comes out, it doesn't mean aliens, illuminati or cover up. They ALWAYS think it's hiding stuff and therefore that stuff is mind blowing. They also tend to be people with very little life skills, loaners or people that perhaps don't feel they have a voice in modern life and so seek to attach themselves to bizarre claims. They also have a total inability to accept facts and only seem willing to question those they feel are hiding stuff and never those that are making stuff up, no matter how preposterous it is. It wont change, same reason we have trolls, it's a call for help and the actions of the disenfranchised..
 
Common topic in my circle of friends at 3/4am after a heavy night. Well CT are always good I find around then. They mainly come out to play when my mates who smoke weed are present, and the 3 of them all agree with one another, which is completely the opposite to the non-weed smokers.... and their firm beliefs in this case are that is was the government. Anyone relate? But back on topic.

Forget 9/11 for a second. This applies to all CT and secrets. As soon as you tell 1 person something, the chances of others finding out multiply 10 fold, tell more people and it soon escalates beyond controllability. Easy concept to understand yes?

Bring back 9/11. How many people would have to be involved? 100's? 1000's? Some posts suggest here that the whole worlds media is. So 10,000's? 100,000's?

No one has ever come forward with anything of any credibility. And in a day and age where it so easy to get/share/ spread info. I think it answers itself.

Also in every generation there are people willing to fight for what they believe in, whether against a government or not. If 1000's of people were involved, atleast 1 person would have been against the Government murdering thousands of it's own people.... and would have done something.

Why can't people just accept that this was an horrific act of terrorism, the first of its kind, and it took great skill and planning to orchestrate and execute.
 
Last edited:
What CT cretins simply don't understand, is that just because a corporation or government isn't totally accurate, gets stuff wrong, makes false statements or chooses not to share stuff the later comes out, it doesn't mean aliens, illuminati or cover up.

:confused:
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;26341264 said:
You don't kill 3000 people in an audaciously over the top attack using outlandlish never tried before methods because you are a wealthy person who fancies some insurance fraud, just what on earth?

I love all the insurance fraud arguments. All the posters about Silverstein that get shared on Social media. Most of them are massively inaccurate. I work in the London Insurance market. For an insurer who co-insured the towers. If a CT nut brings this up, I instantly lose interest.
 
Guys

What if..What if Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 was actually a cruise missile?

Actually you're not far from the truth. The reason MH370 has disappeared is because it was actually one of the planes to hit the two towers.

I've seen evidence on a Youtube video that the Illuminati in conjuction with the CIA developed a *TOP SECRET* weapon, which could transport an object through SPACE AND TIME. There's no evidence of the collusion because the department responsible was based in WTC7, and they blew that up to cover their tracks.

The question you're all asking is "Well why haven't we had another airliner disappear without trace?". The answer is simple, IT HASN'T DISAPPEARED YET. At some point in the future another airliner will disappear and you'll know that THAT WAS THE SECOND WTC PLANE.

The original planes that went missing on September 11th were diverted to Saudi Arabia, where the passengers onboard (WHO WERE all SCIENTISTS who developed the SYsTEm to TELEPORT the PLANES) were able to reap the benefits of the INSURANCE CLAIM through secret JEWISH BANK ACCOUNTS.

The object that hit the PENTAGON was actually a cruise missile launched by government as a false FLAG operation so we could INVADE SIRIA to get their OIL.
 
Imo the US Government certainly had the capability (techspertise, equipment, etc). This only leaves the question of motivation and everyone must decide for themselves whether there are secrets that would justify such a risky operation to cover up. If it was an inside job then these things are happening at such a high level that Joe Public can not realistically expect to ever know the truth or influence future possible similar enterprises.

So why bother worrying ?
 
I have a friend who is big into CT's so i've heard a lot, and looked into a lot out of curiosity and tbh it wasnt all time wasted i did learn a lot of interesting things in amongst the piles of nonsense.

Its interesting just how dedicated some of these conmen are to what they do, theres so many different theories that conflict each other, and its interesting watching some like Judy Wood arguing with the proponent of an alternative theory, they cant all be right, so most must be either conmen or deluded, take your pick lol. They are dedicated thats for sure but for some its possibly a living doing lectures on it. One thing i think is for certain is the answer isnt on the internet..
 
One thing i think is for certain is the answer isnt on the internet..

Indeed. Most of my mates who believe in the CTs link things from youtube. Normally start with 'Hi I am Joe Bloggs and I am an expert i nthis field' or the title says the same. Hold up. You have never met this person, and now because they have made a youtube video claiming they are an expert in this, its 100000% proof.

I am like 'c'mon... stop making this too easy.'
 
Hell the BBC reported WTC7 falling 20 minutes before it actually occured which tells me someone high up within that corporation had prior knowledge of the event

If you had bothered to look into it you would know they did have prior knowledge because the fire chiefs on site had pulled people back because thye knew WTC could not survive much longer, the BBC just misreported an imminent collapse as a collapse then corrected itself.
 
This only leaves the question of motivation

To garner public support to invade Afghanistan and the "War on Terror" perhaps?
They could have possibly taken the utilitarian view that to sacrifice a few thousand to potentially save millions more from the perceived threat of global Islamification is an acceptable loss.
 
controlled demolition

You do understand that WTC7 was at the time slightly bigger than any building that had ever been demo'ed, and the towers were more than twice the size, it would have taken a full demo crew over half a year to wire up the buildings, with not a single person noticing anything odd.

Do you really REALLY think that could have been done? any WHY would anyone do that when the planes alone were guaranteed to get the job done? :confused:
 
HE took out a new insurance policy on the buildings before 911 adding in a clause for terrorist attacks.

Actually that's a myth spread by CT nuts.

Firstly he didn't take out a policy with an added clause for terrorism in the months leading up to the attack, he RENEWED the existing policy as it was due to expire, and that policy as standard for any skyscraper protected against terrorism.

Secondly the money from the 9/11 claim doesn't even come close to the cost of building the new WTC, he will be dead before the financial loss of 9/11 to him is recovered.

I once had a car rear ended by somebody the day after they renewed their insurance, does that make them a fraudster because they took out a policy that had a clause which insured them against hitting other people and then it happened?
 
Back
Top Bottom