Soldato
- Joined
- 2 May 2011
- Posts
- 12,324
- Location
- Woking
You're using that term wrong, again.
Intentionally
You're using that term wrong, again.
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/05/26/openly-gay-ukip-mep-elected-in-scotland/
An openly gay UKIP MEP has been elected for the first time ever, David Coburn.
i'm no big fan of ukip or farage but you are taking the views of a few ukip nutcases and they aren't representative. Farage has criticised those views and sacked a number of ukip member who have those views.
It also has to be said that both the conservatives and labour have there fair share of crazy nutcases with extreme views also.
We need a sensible discussion of ukip, concerns people have and why they felt the need to vote for ukip. Simply insulting them based on unofficial viewpoints doesn't help anybody.
Farage himself said he doesn't like foreign people talking on trains, if that isn't racist I don't know what is. He better not get the train to Brussels that often, which clearly he doesn't as he never turns up in the European Parliament like the rest of his Mep's but is quite happy to take the cash, yet complain of an EU gray train, it's all hypocrisy from ukip
He said not speaking English.
NOT THE FACT THEY ARE THERE!!!
Wow!
Try again.
if that isn't racist I don't know what is.
Farage himself said he doesn't like foreign people talking on trains, if that isn't racist I don't know what is.
Are people really THAT dumb as to believe this is correct? It doesn't matter what % of the UK voted. If they didn't vote, you can't assume they wouldn't have voted UKIP.
LOL. Quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read on here.
One important thing to bear in mind is that those who have made a decision that they agree with and support UKIP are far more likely to vote in the first place - they've got an opinion on Europe and Politics. Whereas those who didn't bother to vote are likely not UKIP supporters for the same reason.
I suspect we'll never be able to get such figures but if you looked out at the turnout as a percentage of people who support each party, UKIP would have a huge percentage turnout.
Which means its fairly accurate to say that support in the UK for UKIP is probably pretty close to the 30% of the 30% who voted..
Are people really THAT dumb as to believe this is correct? It doesn't matter what % of the UK voted. If they didn't vote, you can't assume they wouldn't have voted UKIP.
LOL. Quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read on here.
That's such a cop out answer to what you quotedPresenting the argument "I have women/black/gay friends, therefore I'm not sexist/racist/homophobic" means you don't understand what it means to be sexist/racist/homophobic.
.
I don't think you understand those cases - they were tax avoidance as opposed to evasion and it gets very complicated when dealing with multi-nationals.
Working cash-in-hand and lying on a self assessment is not the same thing.
Not quite sure that a whole party can be judged on the comments/views of one individual member. Unless of course that one member is the leader and the party make all their MPs vote their way rather than giving them a free vote.
Especially when they disciplined him by withdrawing the party whip from him.
[TW]Fox;26358571 said:I addressed this point earlier:
why not?That's rubbish you can't say that the 30% that voted ukip is the 30% of the UK that would support them. Lol
No personal insults. Thank you.
I will be happy for a holiday for that. Bye
That's rubbish you can't say that the 30% that voted ukip is the 30% of the UK that would support them. Lol
No personal insults. Thank you.
I will be happy for a holiday for that. Bye
Should i be alarmed by the amount Labour have gained. Can you imagine Ed Miliband leading the country