-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Richard Huddy - Gaming Scientist Interviewed
- Thread starter LtMatt
- Start date
Associate
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2013
- Posts
- 2,468
- Location
- Birmingham
Surprised to see you saying that Matt.
We should compare Battlefield 4/Thief results in DX Vs Mantle. See which one really comes out on top seeing as we both have multi gpu setups. Up for it?
Associate
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2013
- Posts
- 2,468
- Location
- Birmingham
We should compare Battlefield 4/Thief results in DX Vs Mantle. See which one really comes out on top seeing as we both have multi gpu setups. Up for it?
No, I don't want to show you up, I'd feel too harsh for it
#NvidiaMasterRace
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 21,105
- Location
- Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
TWIMTB£
No, I don't want to show you up, I'd feel too harsh for it
#NvidiaMasterRace
You'd get taken to the cleaners, just like i did to you in the sky diver thread.
Time to move to the next exiting thing.
Free Sync!
# Free Sync monitors will go out to reviewers from October.
# They will be available to consumers from January 2015
# Free Sync will be variable refresh rate capable (range from 9hz to 240hz)
# Free Sync is a direct communication between the screen and GPU without buffering needed, thus removing the latency this involves making it in this respect better than G-Sync.
start from 56m 41s, or click on link http://youtu.be/8uoD8YKwtww?t=58m38s
Free Sync!
# Free Sync monitors will go out to reviewers from October.
# They will be available to consumers from January 2015
# Free Sync will be variable refresh rate capable (range from 9hz to 240hz)
# Free Sync is a direct communication between the screen and GPU without buffering needed, thus removing the latency this involves making it in this respect better than G-Sync.
start from 56m 41s, or click on link http://youtu.be/8uoD8YKwtww?t=58m38s
Last edited:
I think he's trying to make the video start halfway through Greg. I tried it earlier and got told off for posting the video several times. For some reason it does not work if you embed and start the video at a specific time.
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 8,619
- Location
- Cornwall
Out of interest, what 'code' did you try when you tried it?
I used a website that made it start at a certain time. It worked on my computer, but i think embedding it breaks it.
http://youtubetime.com/
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 8,619
- Location
- Cornwall
I did watch this bit earlier in the week, interesting point about the 9-240 range, though I think he did say that would naturally stick a premium on the monitor as its outside of usual operating ranges of 24/30/59/60/75/120. Be interested to see what the first lot of units do range at. He seemed quite careful not to mention any specific monitor manufacturers, which makes you wonder how many ate actually on board with pushing this?
As for the gsync latency thing, idk tbh, no one else has mentioned latency besides the complete opposite of what this guy is saying, in that it removed all additional frame lag, leaving that limit down to the panel. Now this fella claims it adds lag?
I do have to say though the fact its a driver driven solution worries me slightly, **** ups are easily made by any driver vendor, add new feature/fix existing bug - break 3 other things then wait 3 months for a driver that does everything
Edit: apologies for any inaccuracies, was days ago I watched the video, or skipped through it at least