I did mention Hamas' position which has nothing to do with a two state solution.
However I wasn't arguing or supporting Hamas position, which incidently will fall into line with Fatah and The Two State Solution when the agreed Unity Government elections take place sometime this year, if that happens now Israel have begun their offensive. I was simply quoting that specific paragraph and making a statement which you have subsequently illustrated. Craterloads also made specific mention in his paragraph that the fighting has to stop on both sides he called it the Roundabout..and a settlement t needs to be reached on a two state solution while the blockade and other issues such as illegal settlements in West Bank need to cease. I find it hard to argue against that, you seem to want to make it something it isn't, by introducing something that wasn't stated and ignoring the facts as presented in that paragraph.
The fact that you mentioned impartial whilst quoting a Craterloads post made me assume you were being ironic...
Unless of course by impartial you actually mean "Totally supports Palestine whilst thinking Israel are spawn of the devil"?
What Craterloads ultimately expresses in other posts is irrelevant as I quoted a specific paragraph for a reason and gave that reason..it is not a validation of anything other than the sentiment expressed in the quoted passage. You want to introduce something that wasn't expressed nor quoted, in any case from what I have read Craterloads has not said that Hamas are righteous while Israelis are the "spawn of the devil"... You seem to be intent on creating an argument against what was quoted and in so doing are illustrating the very difficulty you have in doing so without remaining objective and impartial.