The olde TV licence

I've always wondered if there was a device that would record live TV and play it back to you 1 second later, therefore making it not live, but still appearing live to the viewer

Legally, it has to be 1 hour after the broadcast, not 1 second. That's when stuff becomes available on TV-on-demand like 4oD etc. E.g. if Casualty aired at 8PM, it'll be available on Live Player from 9PM onwards.
 
Legally, it has to be 1 hour after the broadcast, not 1 second. That's when stuff becomes available on TV-on-demand like 4oD etc. E.g. if Casualty aired at 8PM, it'll be available on Live Player from 9PM onwards.

If you record it you need to have a TV licence regardless of when you watch it. If you watch it on iPlayer then it's fine as long as it's not a live stream. The law doesn't stipulate times.
 
If you record it you need to have a TV licence regardless of when you watch it. If you watch it on iPlayer then it's fine as long as it's not a live stream. The law doesn't stipulate times.

Okies, thanks :-)

I've got a PC with DVD/blu-ray player and I play my boxsets on that (South Park etc). That's legal without a TV license too isn't it, as long as I bought the boxsets? Got about 50 blu-rays now and over 150 DVDs.
 
Legally, it has to be 1 hour after the broadcast, not 1 second. That's when stuff becomes available on TV-on-demand like 4oD etc. E.g. if Casualty aired at 8PM, it'll be available on Live Player from 9PM onwards.

What about watching all these +1 channels!!???!!!

They're showing the program 1 hour later than it's broadcast!! There's most of the ITV, CH4 and CH5 channels, and I even think there's some (if not all) of the BBC channels on +1 now!! ;)
 
She doesn't need a license and she doesn't need to let them in or talk to them unless they turn up with a warrant.

If you want them to go away then just pull out and start recording them, AFAIK they've been instructed to walk away now when filmed... partly as a result of some of their dimmer colleagues not coming off too well on YouTube videos.
 
You need a TV license to receive broadcast TV signals. It doest matter if you record them and watch them later, or its a +1 channel playing stuff an hour late, or if its Dave playing repeats of everything ever, its still a live broadcast TV signal.

Its also not just the BBC that you pay for.
 
Is it news to me.

The BBC is not allowed to use the TVL money outside of UK content (although they are now having to use it to fund World Service Radio as the government decided to save some money in the foreign office budget).

They are also not allowed to freely use content produced by their foreign broadcast operations in the UK.
In both directions the BBC has to pay/receive market rate for the content to avoid competition issues.
It's also why the BBC have BBC:Worldwide as it's commercial arm, which makes quite a low headline profit, but returns a lot to the BBC - as it has to keep the profit from it's operations separate from it's costs, of which one of the biggest is paying the BBC market rate for content*.
What the BBC does tend to do for some stuff is to share the cost between both the UK TVL funded operation and Worldwide as what would normally be classed as "co-productions", I think things like BBC Click on the news channel is one such program, and I'm fairly sure several drama programmes have both the BBC and BBC Worldwide credits.

IIRC there are parts of the BBC website that you cannot access in the UK because they are actually under the BBC Worldwide arm, and thus paid for commercially.

It's one of the reasons BBC America will show content from all providers, as it buys it in:)

*Apparently both the BBC and BBCWW have fairly large teams of buyers/sellers whose job it is to buy or sell content to the best bidder, which leads to the rather funny situation where effectively one part of the BBC is basically employing people to get a better deal out of another part of it (a little like some councils might have certain in house services that have to bid for tasks inside the council, with outside contractors also bidding).
 
You pay for the BBC not any other, but no doubt fill the Jimmy Savile+others legal fund coffers with it but that would still come under the BBC.
 
Just cancelled our licence and got a refund as we'd paid ahead for the year.

Explained our sky was cancelled, we watch no live TV and we only watch Netflix, Amazon and NowTV.
 
Why should we not pay for the BBC? Its content is far above any other TV channel.

What's good on Channel 5?

You could argue it's the best of a bad lot, but the TV channel bar is set pretty low, so that's not really saying much.

On demand content has been the norm for at least half a decade now, initially via dodgy downloads and more recently through specialist subscription services.

The concept of TV channels is well past it's sell by date, consumers have long since moved on, regardless of what the media dinosaurs think.
 
Back
Top Bottom