OMFG the royal family cost £32 million a year. They give us back £200 Million in cash every year.
And don't forget £500+ million in tourism the royal family bring in.
It greatly exceeds what they cost.
It's not a law.
Most of that cost would exist for any head of state.
If you argue against the monarchy on the basis of money then you just make yourself look ignorant or deceitful.
wow a very privileged man and woman reproduced again. That is amazing news.
wow a very privileged man and woman reproduced again. That is amazing news.
He only get's her pregnant because those last few months are the only time she has any breasts. She's nice enough to look at but dresses like a 50 year old.
She doesn't do anything for me personally
She doesn't do anything for me personally
All of which you can't actually definitively prove, so it's pointless arguing it.
that whole argument has been dashed repeatedly time and time again, the royals dont equal tourism![]()
me neither and her sister is butt ugly imo.
kates probably about a 6 not a great fan of her looks or skeletal figure
Well all the data across the net and news papers and a BBC program says the same as me(just google).
But if you have info of it not being the case then please post it. Will be waiting for both your posts.
I don't think you've understood my post...