Transfer the money abroad, than back to whoever you are sending the money too.
However if you can fully understand the level of incompetence than you would not bother with that and simply live in a state of blissful ignorance.
I just.... What?
Transfer the money abroad, than back to whoever you are sending the money too.
However if you can fully understand the level of incompetence than you would not bother with that and simply live in a state of blissful ignorance.
IHT on the other hand - well you're dead when it comes into effect, its aim is to stop large chunks of wealth from being perpetually handed down - I'm really not seeing the unfair aspect. So far you've just pointed out that tax has already been paid earlier down the line - but that is the case with tax in general...
Isn't it odd that people are happy for the rich to pay more taxes unless its them getting a large amount of free money then all of a sudden its not fair
Probably, I know I wouldn't declare a cash gift from a family member.
Isn't it odd that people are happy for the rich to pay more taxes unless its them getting a large amount of free money then all of a sudden its not fair
Isn't it odd that people are happy for the rich to pay more taxes unless its them getting a large amount of free money then all of a sudden its not fair
Inheritance tax comes across as unfair in my opinion because they've earnt the money, paid tax on it already and then the money gets taxed again when you get it.
It's not really the same is it. Assume you're talking about income tax vs inheritance.
Im talking about taxation in general but in your case its even worse. On one side you have tax taken from someones earnings which they have worked for, and on the other, people are whining about taxation on free money they did nothing to earn.
It's there to guarantee the concentration of wealth (of the ruling class) more like.It's there to prevent concentration of wealth.
But it's their family's money, the government should have no claims to it, and as I said before, if I was in such a situation, everything I could keep in cash would be kept in cash and not declared as being given away.
No it's your parents money. If and when they pass away and they have given you the money, then it would amount to being taxed on unearned income pretty much like any other time outside of a tax free environment like an ISA only you have an allowance of over £300k.
Parents are family...
I am aware how it works. I'm stating that if I were in the position of leaving family a lot of money, I'd do it in cash and not declare it.
The issue would be who to trace it to, though. Additionally cash doesn't take up that much space and I'd sooner trust a hidden safe room than a bank if I had the wealth to justify it.Aside from the impracticalities of keeping vast amounts of cash around the house that are simply too numerous to be worth mentioning, it isn't simple to possible to withdraw large amounts of money and give it away.
On death, your accounts can (and will, for larger estates) be checked for the transaction history. If large withdrawals cannot be traced (showing up in other accounts, no equivalent asset purchased) then they'll be treated as gifts and the nil rate band will be reduced by that amount.