Ebola scaremongering?

Unfortunately I don't have any proof, no. There is huge amounts of evidence however to suggest it was created by the US. Do some googling around, scary stuff.

you dont have proof but you have "huge" amounts of evidence?

but none to hand or that i'm gonna wager you understand/
 
Ebola is a test-tube, lab-created virus designed by the elite as a weapon against humanity. As the world economy sinks over the coming 2 years, expect these 'experiments' to increase.
It wasn't created as a weapon. It was created to make money, as always.
They make money by creating the vaccine. Problem, reaction, solution.
 
1niR213.jpg
 
It wasn't created as a weapon. It was created to make money, as always.
They make money by creating the vaccine. Problem, reaction, solution.

if its abo0ut money why make a vaccine?

the vaccine for small pox killed off a several hundred million dollar a year product line for chemical and pharmaceutical companies.
 
Ebola is a test-tube, lab-created virus designed by the elite as a weapon against humanity. As the world economy sinks over the coming 2 years, expect these 'experiments' to increase.

Were you born this daft or is this level of nonsense something you've actively been working on. Think it through:

a) Ebola would make a poor effective bioweapon.
b) They already have smallpox which does the job better.
c) They have Bird flu that could do the job even better and has been modified to do so.

However, I am sure you are going to post a load of informative arguments to prove me wrong to show some amazing evidence base for you assertions. :rolleyes:

It wasn't created as a weapon. It was created to make money, as always.
They make money by creating the vaccine. Problem, reaction, solution.

And you too - an equally daft assertion - where is this vaccine then they are making the billions from. Why haven't we all had it? Why isn't it being given to everyone in Texas.
 
It's just another scaremongering story dreamt up by the politicians to subdue the populace to their will. They're using the sam sort of scares about bombing campaigns every Christmas.
 
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/04/ebola-zaire-peter-piot-outbreak

Fascinating interview with the scientist who discovered Ebola.

I am more worried about the many people from India who work in trade or industry in west Africa. It would only take one of them to become infected, travel to India to visit relatives during the virus's incubation period, and then, once he becomes sick, go to a public hospital there. Doctors and nurses in India, too, often don't wear protective gloves. They would immediately become infected and spread the virus.
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-end-of-october-scientists-claim-9775693.html

Scientists have claimed the Ebola virus could reach the UK and France by the end of the month.

Following an analysis of disease spread patterns and airline traffic data, experts have predicted there is a 75 per cent chance the virus could be imported to France by October 24, while there is a 50 per cent chance it could have also hit Britain.

The deadly epidemic has killed more than 3,400 people since it began in West Africa in March and has now started to spread faster, infecting almost 7,200 people so far.

The estimates have been based on air traffic remaining at full capacity. An 80 per cent reduction in travel however would see France's risk remain at 25 per cent, while Britain's risk would still be at 15 per cent.

Nigeria, Senegal and the US, where the first case was diagnosed on Tuesday in a man who flew in from Liberia, have all seen people carrying the Ebola haemorrhagic fever virus, apparently unwittingly, arrive on their shores.

France and Britain have each treated one national who was brought home with the disease before being cured.

The scientists' study suggests that more may bring it to Europe not knowing they are infected.

Sounds peachy.
 
Were you born this daft or is this level of nonsense something you've actively been working on. Think it through:

a) Ebola would make a poor effective bioweapon.
b) They already have smallpox which does the job better.
c) They have Bird flu that could do the job even better and has been modified to do so.

However, I am sure you are going to post a load of informative arguments to prove me wrong to show some amazing evidence base for you assertions. :rolleyes:



And you too - an equally daft assertion - where is this vaccine then they are making the billions from. Why haven't we all had it? Why isn't it being given to everyone in Texas.

Exactly.
Just shows you how people who want to believe can

Besides. Ebola is ancient

What you really want if you are a nut case is influenzas transmissibility and ebolas fatality rate
 
Exactly.
Just shows you how people who want to believe can

Besides. Ebola is ancient

What you really want if you are a nut case is influenzas transmissibility and ebolas fatality rate

What about if you could combine Ebola and Influenza like the Soviet Union was rumoured to have achieved?

P.S. Ebola was only discovered in 1976, so not really ancient.
 
they are all trying to kill us "ahhhhhh" *runs and hides in the tin foil box* "nothing can get me now"
if *they* really were going to use a bioweapon like this i would seriously start to question the R&D that decided this was the best method
 
they are all trying to kill us "ahhhhhh" *runs and hides in the tin foil box* "nothing can get me now"
if *they* really were going to use a bioweapon like this i would seriously start to question the R&D that decided this was the best method

i'd like to think our bioweapons experts are better than this really.
 
Is it election time already! :p

Go to find a demon, ISIS, Ebola etc..lol

Happens eveytime the is an election coming up!! :D

It gets boring after a few decades! :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom