Ebola scaremongering?

The horrendous thing about this is really that it might only be spreading exactly because we've been trying to treat it, without being able to do so effectively. If it had been left to its own devices it would most likely kill the population exposed to it before it had a chance to spread very far as has been the case in past outbreaks of the virus.

Yep, the whole reason we were there was to stop it because they didn't have the medical infrastructure to deal with it.
 
The horrendous thing about this is really that it might only be spreading exactly because we've been trying to treat it, without being able to do so effectively. If it had been left to its own devices it would most likely kill the population exposed to it before it had a chance to spread very far as has been the case in past outbreaks of the virus.

This.

Those medics that were sent to bring back ebola had absolutely no idea what they were actually mobilised for.

Just like those soldiers who went looking for WMDs had absolutely no idea they were mobilised on the lies of their own leaders.
 
This.

Those medics that were sent to bring back ebola had absolutely no idea what they were actually mobilised for.

Just like those soldiers who went looking for WMDs had absolutely no idea they were mobilised on the lies of their own leaders.

For the love of Christ give over.
 
For the love of Christ give over.

There's evidence that ebola is being used by propagandist organisations and you're telling me to give over?

Give over what exactly? Posting my opinions? Explaining psychological devices? Giving insight?

At least make an attempt at refuting what you quoted.
 
Last edited:
This.

Those medics that were sent to bring back ebola had absolutely no idea what they were actually mobilised for.

Just like those soldiers who went looking for WMDs had absolutely no idea they were mobilised on the lies of their own leaders.

Well I don't know about that exactly. In my opinion it's just a consequence of what could be considered unfortunately placed compassion to stay in the area and continue treating people, holding the needs of the individual above the risk to the wider population. It's not like aid workers in Africa were unheard of before this.
 
I'm telling you to give over because you're posting nothing but alex jones-esque conspiracy theory horse ****. There's nothing to refute because it's alex jones-esque conspiracy theory horse **** with a side order of pretentious pseduo psychology that you like to wheel out every once in a while in a thread too.

Your opinions are nonsense (seriously, quoting the Georgia Guidestones?). The idea that you're exposing some hidden psycholigcal device that only you seem capable of comprehending is nonsense and what insight you think you have is nonsense too. Watching you perform this pretentious nonsense is pretty insufferable and absolutely cringe worthy.

You wonder why they sent Western medics there? Did it ever occur to you that quite possibly they went there for humanitarian reasons and absolutely positively not because they're having their strings pulled by some secretive shadowy government agency with an agenda? Of course not. That would just be crazy!
 
You wonder why they sent Western medics there? Did it ever occur to you that quite possibly they went there for humanitarian reasons and absolutely positively not because they're having their strings pulled by some secretive shadowy government agency with an agenda? Of course not. That would just be crazy!

The first two paragraphs of your post are just your thoughts of my personal self so I've omitted that and cant be bothered and see no point defending myself to you.

You are demonstrating an inability to differentiate between intention, reality, and effect.

Of course those medics went there for humanitarian reasons (intention) that is commendable and I'm usually first to pick up on another person's compassion. But why do you choose to deny the reality that they also bought back ebola and/or had a small catalytic effect on localised spreading, perhaps even in the area they were sent to?
 
Last edited:
The first two paragraphs of your post are just your thoughts of my personal self so I've omitted that.

You shouldn't.

You aren't demonstrating an ability to differentiate between intention, reality, and effect.

I'm sure you're trying to be really profound here, but you're not... it's just more nonsense that has absolutely no relevance to the post except for in your own head.

Of course those medics went there for humanitarian reasons (intention). But why do you chose to deny the reality that they bought back ebola?

I never denied that they brought ebola back. But that has absolutely nothing to do with the unbelievable levels of conspiracy theory horse **** in your posting in this thread. Which was the crux of my post. So I have no idea why you're not addressing that and choosing instead to try and turn this on me denying they brought back ebola. So let's get back to your unbelievable levels of conspiracy theory horse ****. And the side order of pretentious pseudo psychology too.

Let's get back to you wondering "I'm not saying Ebola (specifically) is a governmentally sanctioned weapon of biological warfare. But..." which is the conspiracy theorists equivilant of "I'm not racist, but..." and about intentional infections, the Georgia guidestones, and the analysis of a ****ing Simpsons cartoon.
 
You shouldn't.



I'm sure you're trying to be really profound here, but you're not... it's just more nonsense that has absolutely no relevance to the post except for in your own head.



I never denied that they brought ebola back. But that has absolutely nothing to do with the unbelievable levels of conspiracy theory horse **** in your posting in this thread. Which was the crux of my post. So I have no idea why you're not addressing that and choosing instead to try and turn this on me denying they brought back ebola. So let's get back to your unbelievable levels of conspiracy theory horse ****. And the side order of pretentious pseudo psychology too.

Let's get back to you wondering "I'm not saying Ebola (specifically) is a governmentally sanctioned weapon of biological warfare. But..." which is the conspiracy theorists equivilant of "I'm not racist, but..." and about intentional infections, the Georgia guidestones, and the analysis of a ****ing Simpsons cartoon.

Why are you trying your best to shut me up?

If you want to discuss the psychological effect (or non effect) of that cartoon segment then discuss it, or just shut up yourself.

The analysis of media is a field of study in psychology itself. You saying something like "analysis of a ****ing simpsons cartoon" and you clear acknowledgement that I seem profound, simply makes you look dumb in reality and/or self conscious about your own intellect.
 
Last edited:
Why are you trying your best to shut me up?

You're a threat to national security. We're onto you. That and everything you've said in this thread is absolute horse ****.

If you want to discuss the psychological effect of that cartoon segment then discuss it.

I'd really like to hear more of your (absolutely unqualified) pseudo psychological analysis of a cartoon. I'd also really like to hear more of your (absolutely unqualified) pseudo psychological analysis of "how much trust people put in their government even after being victim to all the corruption, mind control, greed, dominance, aim to control the world, and so on, they impose on their citizens.". And let's have some more of your (absolutely unqualified) pseudo psychological opinions on the men and women who went out there for humanitarian reasons being nothing more than puppets of secretive shadowy government agencies with an agenda.

Or you can just tell me I just don't get it and I'm too dumb to understand and save everyone the excruciating mind numbing boredom of you regurgitating crap you've read on InfoWars and Prison Planet.
 
This clearly isn't going anywhere. If I want to discuss psychology I will discuss it with my mate who is researching toward a doctorate. If I want to discuss biology I will discuss it with my brother who is also researching towards a doctorate.

If I want to post my personal opinion and have it replied to with a barrage of "**** this" and "**** that" by some angry guy who's located in "YER MA" you have simply concreted my idea of where to come. Well done.
 
Last edited:
This clearly isn't going anywhere.

Ergo you have nothing to respond with. I mean, you took your time just to post up this little "I'm taking my ball and going home" retort.

If I want to discuss psychology I will discuss it with my mate who is researching toward a doctorate.

Well isn't that just a marvellous coinkydink that you just happen to have a mate researching a doctorate. You still don't and aren't though. So stop pretending like you are. You could have course have schooled me with all you know about it, since you have a friend studying a doctorate and the way you're carrying on means your knowledge of it is somehow on par with his simply because you know him.

If I want to discuss biology I will discuss it with my brother who is also researching towards a doctorate.

Good for him. But I don't care about your brother. He's not the one here posting.

If I want to post my personal opinion and have it replied to with a barrage of "**** this" and "**** that" by some angry guy who's located in "YER MA" you have simply concreted my idea of where to come. Well done.

If you don't want your personal opinion questioned on the internet don't post it and then get ****y when someone calls it ********. It's also a really **** poor attempt by yourself to attempt to save some face from this by alluding to the fact I happen to swear somehow lessens what I've said. At least I am not a pretentious shyster alluding to some greater intelligence than I have. If you really where as intelligent as you like to think you are you'd have had no problem dispatching the uncouth hooligan who happens to swear too much with your superior intellect and silver tongue.
 
I have a good ability to understand people and differing viewpoints, I gave you an opportunity to teach me yours and you have done so. I also have a right to post my understanding of things, which I have done. Please stop being so insulting.

It's a real shame when one man's mundane insight makes another uncontrollably angry. A real wedge in the search for knowledge and truth. This is why i said I'd much rather have intellectual discussions with actual intellectuals rather than some guy on a forum who cant even get over how clever or stupid one or the other is. I wasn't saying I have the psychoanalytic ability of my psychologist friend. Just proves how poorly you understand things.
 
Last edited:
I have a good ability to understand people and differing viewpoints

No you don't. You like to think you do though. Or maybe you just like to pretend you do to appear more likeable.

I gave you an opportunity to teach me yours and you have done so.

At no point did I see you say "teach me your viewpoints".

I also have a right to post my understanding of things, which I have done. Please stop being so insulting.

And like I said before, post em, just don't get ****y when someone calls them ********. And as for "please stop being so insulting". Could you be any more pathetic? I wouldn't be surprised if you've reported all my posts with "he's picking' on me!".

It's a real shame when one man's mundane insight makes another uncontrollably angry.

Your mundane insights didn't make me angry (there were no mundane insights). It was your conspiacy theory ******** that made me angry. But we've already covered that and your "mundane insight" quip is just another pathetic attempt to make yourself out to be some sort of victim of the guy who called you out on your ********.

A real wedge in the search for knowledge and truth.

Oh dear God here you go trying to be all profound again. Just stop it.

This is why i said I'd much rather have intellectual discussions with actual intellectuals rather than some guy on a forum who cant even get over how clever or stupid one or the other is.

Yeah sure. You spend a lot of time with some real intellectuals. That's why your head is full of conspiracy theories, georgia guide stones and pretentious psycho-analysing of Simpsons cartoons. This is exactly why I called you a pretentious shyster.
 
lol. I think I know what the subject will be in my appointment with my good mate Dr. Psychoanalyser tomorrow afternoon. :D While I'm at it I'll ask my good bro Dr. Biologist if it's a hereditary problem. :p
 
Last edited:
What the hell are you chatting about ASIM :confused:
Seriously dude you sound like you're sat their with a tin-foil hat on!!

This ebola problem has been going on for nearly a year, the ONLY reason the west are getting evolved now is because it's become a bigger problem and it's spreading to western countries.

We have ourselves to blame somewhat for this, had we been more compassionate and empathetic we could have nipped it in the bud many many months ago!

The ONLY way this will be resolved is if the international community sends in teams of medical experts to contain and treat the ebola victims.
Something which is now happening however as it's taken so long to respond the difficulty and time to get it under control is now much more severe :-(
 
Seems there have been dozens of ebola outbreaks in the past 40 years or so which have been contained without massive losses in the scope of things.

So perhaps the threat is being played up a little by the press or given freedom movement today its significantly harder to contain. Probably a bit of both, but I guess the solution to the problem is there.
 
Anyone ever read the Tom Clancy novel where Ebola was used in a terror attack?


I await the plot appearing in the daily Mail next week
 
Great book :)

Actually a well known fact that Clancy is an isis sympathiser who gave them this plan back in 1995 then wrote executive orders in order to subvert our attention from that it was really happening.

Quite smart really.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom