London on high alert too

Considering God told George Bush to invade Iraq I'm not sure it's even been entirely worked out of their system in the west, let alone other countries where fundamentalist Christians are still very much at the reins of many countries.

Which countries have fundamental Christians at the reins?
 
According to some anders behring brevik had a far-right militant ideology and his worldview encompassed islamaphobia and support for far-right zionism. His actions are not true Christian, so if he claimed at any one time to be Christian then he could only be seen as a false Christian.


No don't, the same goes for the Muslim terrorists- they don't follow mainstream Islam.
 
Not all religions carry a terrorist threat.

Dont see Christians/Catholic creating chaos in the name of jesus/God

Ever heard of "Media Control"? Ever heard of "The KKK"? Ever heard of "Anders Breivik"? You see where this is going.

Edit: That nasty bloke a good number of decades back, Hitler, he was a Christian you know :)
 
Just some perspective.

Approximately 5 people are killed by lightening in the UK each year. You are more likely to die from a lightening strike than from a terrorist attack.

Can you provide a link to this seemingly BS statistic? - Please use a reputable source.
 
Can you provide a link to this seemingly BS statistic? - Please use a reputable source.

Article in the guardian from 2014 which states 5 deaths in uk per year (you can also find other sources mentioning this figure quite easily). http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/28/venice-beach-lightning-death-15th-this-year

Terrorist deaths in uk since 2000: 58 (lee rigby, london bombings, and a student in Birmingham although that is debatable).

Approx lighting deaths since 2000: 5 x 15 = 75.

Hence, more likely to die from lighting.

Of course you can choose different start dates but I don't think deriving from the last 15 years is unreasonable. If you start from 1990 the odds swing even more in lighting's favour.
 
Last edited:
Wow, never has one post contained so much fail.

Oslo massacre wasn't committed in the name of Christianity, he actually committed it for a number of reasons, the main being racism - he was hoping to "stem the tide of Islamic immigration in to Europe". In fact he specifically stated he did not see himself as religious.

The IRA were involved in a political war against the UK government over the occupation of NI. It just happens that both sides were of predominantly differing denominations of Christianity.

Anti-abortion killings - aye they were wackadoodle Christians. Also people who were ironically pro-life. Morons.

The LRA is actually recognised as a religious cult - mostly because nobody is really sure what the hell their ideology is. They certainly don't seem to follow Christ or his teachings but talk of God and the 10 commandments.

Lebanon was a civil war. The killing went both ways - atrocities on both sides.

The KKK - they're just friggin racist nutjobs.

The holocaust definitely wasn't carried out in the name of Christianity. Infact the Nazi party worked to reduce the influence of the church in Germany.

lol, 101 pathetic excuses to excuse another religion, but different when its Islam. Double standards much?
 
Well the majority aren't British,and i'm sure the Saudi would want them.
What if they have no family? same thing as now really.
What if their family is British? i,m sure the arabs would love to have them, do you mean British going back 100 years, or never born in this country yet holding a British passport.

Why would the terrorist care? They would, if they didn't then the family would know how much they care.

what other policies could you put into place, you need to start somewhere and evolve.

So basically anyone who isn't white, isn't british, therefore should be deported. At least have the balls to say your opinion clearly.
 
"Millions more copies of French weekly Charlie Hebdo are being printed after the first run sold out in hours" from the BBC

Hope I get a copy.

yup, and indeed our muslim friends are once more making threats and declaring the publishing of a magazine an 'act of war'.

Turkey has banned it altogether. Go figure.
 
Come again? :confused: "extremist" on what subject? killing all pedos and rapists?

Someone posted something along the lines of "kill them all" about muslims, in retaliation for the Paris attack. I was sure it was you, but it appears it wasn't, so I apologise. :)

Although to be fair your views are pretty extreme.... There's a lot of killing involved :p
 
There was a Muslim imam on the BBC saying the front page of Charlie Hebdo should have been left as a blank page. Talk about letting the terrorists win. I hope these cartoons are printed over and over again.
 
The Troubles?,

The conflict was primarily a political one, but it also had an ethnic or sectarian dimension, although it was not a religious conflict.

The Troubles


The Northern Irish question crystallized on the religious issue. Since the establishment of plantations of British land grabbing in Ulster, and with the defeat of the Catholic Jacobites in 1690 at the Battle of the Boyne, the British Anglican dominated Ulster politically and economically. In 1921, the Anglo-Irish Treaty caused the separation of the six counties of Northern Ireland from the Irish Free State, which became by the adoption of the Constitution in 1937, the Republic of Ireland.

Northern Ireland : religious war or social conflict ?
At the start it was like this, but not now and as I live here and was in the army for 21 years I do know what I am talking about when I say it is about religion
 
Back
Top Bottom