Shaming? Really? When did that ever happen…
ok sorry it happened in the Swedish press. Not read UK news today, but yeah its probably not frowned upon back there

Shaming? Really? When did that ever happen…
We pay enough TAX as it is, good for HSBC!
Just to point out, this new "scandal" is about HSBC helping people evade paying tax, which is illegal. Not avoid paying tax, like any accountant would do.
They have been advising clients on ways to do offshore banking such that they can keep their income secret from HMRC, which is illegal. You must declare your income and pay the tax due. This isn't some profit-strike-out plot or the like. This is straight up laundering.
It's not quite money laundering.
Not in the slightest, amoral behaviour from the banks is nothing new.
There is another optionThe shortfall can be dealt with by borrowing more (short term and just shifts the problem to later, assuming that borrowing is even an option) or by increasing the tax on the remaining population of tax-payers (that would include you and me), or by spending less
Interesting that they were the only ones to not need a bailout. Coincidence?After seeing them launder billions for the mexican cartel, this really doesn't surprise me. Like.. at all.
Hopefully naming and shaming these people will allow all governments tax offices to recoup a bit of lost revenue.
These people have committed a criminal offence. They need prosecuting, not shaming.
These people have committed a criminal offence. They need prosecuting, not shaming.
The rest have been asked to repay the tax that they've evaded. Can you imagine a common thief being completely let off if they returned the goods that they'd stolen?
They haven't been asked to pay back all the tax isn't it 10% and the guarantee of no prosecution.
I am quite sure the local crook would like that deal ...
Even if recovering the money is faster and cheaper in the long run?
These people have committed a criminal offence. They need prosecuting, not shaming.
Is it the customers or the bank that should prosecuted?
If I get a taxi, and it turns out that the taxi driver wasn't declaring all of his fares, is it me or him that has committed a criminal offence?
If in a years time it turns out that the builder who did my driveway wasn't paying VAT, is it me or him that has committed a criminal offence?
Is it the customers or the bank that should prosecuted?
If I get a taxi, and it turns out that the taxi driver wasn't declaring all of his fares, is it me or him that has committed a criminal offence?
If in a years time it turns out that the builder who did my driveway wasn't paying VAT, is it me or him that has committed a criminal offence?