Muslim family complains about non believer burial plot.

true, they've got a reputation for being honest/trustworthy

they're also very well educated and very unlikely to misunderstand letters/requests from local authorities
 
true, they've got a reputation for being honest/trustworthy

they're also very well educated and very unlikely to misunderstand letters/requests from local authorities

It is also a misconception that they never tax cars, have MOT's or driving licenses or Insurance.

And it's a fact that they always but always declare all their honest and well deserved income from scrap to the taxman.

It's also a lie that they drive around with a van with tarmac on it offering to do a top class cheap drive resurface as they are in the area and have some materials left over.

And they never knock on your door telling you they can see a missing slate and luckily they have ladders on the van and can do a good quick cheap repair with a 10 yr. guarantee.

They've never looked back since Prescott told them they were a protected ethnic minority.

Who'll win between the ethnic minority liason officer and the Romany and Traveller liason officer ?
 
QG1SXXW.jpg
 
His family later received notice that relations of the man buried alongside him had complained because Mr Smith was not an adherent of the Islamic faith.

Islamic religious authorities say that it is forbidden for non-Muslims to be buried alongside Muslims under normal circumstances.
No one should give two ****s about what the "Islamic religious authorities" say.

They don't own or administer the burial plot.

Muslims law is not be the governing law of Britain, and if it ever becomes so, I will have long since left.
 
No one should give two ****s about what the "Islamic religious authorities" say.

They don't own or administer the burial plot.

Muslims law is not be the governing law of Britain, and if it ever becomes so, I will have long since left.

You're getting a bit carried away here, it's very clearly not a case of Islamic law superseding UK law. They've just phrased it really poorly.

What they should be saying is that it's forbidden for a Muslim to be buried next to a non-Muslim, because at least that focuses on the actions of the Muslims.
 
You're getting a bit carried away here, it's very clearly not a case of Islamic law superseding UK law. They've just phrased it really poorly.

What they should be saying is that it's forbidden for a Muslim to be buried next to a non-Muslim, because at least that focuses on the actions of the Muslims.

If the piece is to be believed, the muslim family aren't asking for their plot to be moved.

But rather (if it's true) for the non-believer to be moved, in order to comply with their religious belief.
 
You're getting a bit carried away here, it's very clearly not a case of Islamic law superseding UK law. They've just phrased it really poorly.

What they should be saying is that it's forbidden for a Muslim to be buried next to a non-Muslim, because at least that focuses on the actions of the Muslims.

Technically the Muslin wasn't buried next to a non-Muslim, it was the non-Muslim that was buried next to the Muslim. So no Muslim law broken? :)

Given that after a day the magical human spirit of made up **** goes to heaven or hell it shouldn't make any difference after this time what happens to the body. :)
 
If the piece is to be believed, the muslim family aren't asking for their plot to be moved.

But rather (if it's true) for the non-believer to be moved, in order to comply with their religious belief.

If that was a relative of mine and they had asked him to be moved, they would get a swift response of go **** yourself!
 
It does seem like the council potentially messed up.

If the muslim family are complaining, it is entirely possible they were told they were in a segregated plot.

The question then is, how you remedy this considering both are already buried.
 
If the piece is to be believed, the muslim family aren't asking for their plot to be moved.

But rather (if it's true) for the non-believer to be moved, in order to comply with their religious belief.

Of course they are, I wouldn't expect any less from any one to be honest. They are going to insist that their customs and beliefs are adhered to. If the peice IS to be believed of course, and it's not a case of they were promised segregated and this contracts that.

With it being the Daily Mail, that's the sort of important info they're likely to leave out.

Technically the Muslin wasn't buried next to a non-Muslim, it was the non-Muslim that was buried next to the Muslim. So no Muslim law broken? :)

You've missed my point. I'm saying Muslims shouldn't say it's forbidden for non-believers to be buried next to them because they are trying to assert their beliefs and customs on people who aren't part of their belief system and for all intents and purposes, reject it.

Ultimately they can control where they are buried specifically, but they can't control who is buried next to them, hence my point about it being forbidden for them to be buried next to a non-believe (at the time and knowingly) making far more sense than trying to tell non-believers where they can be buried.

Given that after a day the magical human spirit of made up **** goes to heaven or hell it shouldn't make any difference after this time what happens to the body. :)


Wat
 
Back
Top Bottom