• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

8K shootout @ TweakTown w/ 9590

Orangey said:
SSAA renders the frame at multiples of the rez, 4X 4K = 8K.

So it's 8K.
Click to expand...

Not with Sniper Elite 3 it is just the normal 2160p settings that everyone uses for that bench and is available as a normal graphics option.

This has got to be one of the very worst reviews I have seen in a long time.
 
AMDMatt said:
This time copying Tweaktowns settings

4x290X QuadFire 8GB (stock)

3840x2160
Ultra Preset + x0AA
150% Resolution Scaling
Mantle

Mantle%20150.png

3840x2160
Ultra Preset + x0AA
150% Resolution Scaling
DX

DX150.png

3840x2160
Ultra Preset + x0AA
200% Resolution Scaling 8K!
Mantle

Mantle%20200.png

3840x2160
Ultra Preset + x0AA
200% Resolution Scaling 8K!
DX

DX%20200.png
Click to expand...

TNA said:
Last I checked quad equals four. I might be wrong though :p;):D
Click to expand...

AMDMatt said:
Battlefield 4 was playable at 8K on Quad 290X 8GB. :)
Click to expand...

RanxZy said:
Yes for people with about 8 Hawaii GPUs ;)
Click to expand...

Sniper Elite V3 was also playable at 8K with Quad (four) 295x2.

AMDMatt said:
Sniper Elite 4K + x4 SuperSampling
Click to expand...

5960X @4.9Ghz
2x295x2 @1215/1625Mhz
14.12
2160P

Zf7hlxh.jpg

Sniper Elite 3 Benchmark Report (DirectX)
================================================================
Created: 2015-02-11 at 16:53:58
Version 1.15a Build Version: 2014.12.09.001
================================================================

Average FPS: 74.6
Minimum FPS: 7.2
Maximum FPS: 1053.5

Number Of Frames: 5643
Average Frame: 13.402ms
Minimum Frame: 0.949ms
Maximum Frame: 139.183ms

Machine Name: MATT
Monitors: 1
Operating System: Windows 8 Professional (build 9200), 64-bit
System RAM: 16253MB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5960X CPU @ 3.00GHz
Number of Cores: 8

GPU Name: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Feature Level: DX11.0
Dedicated VRAM: 3072MB

Resolution Width: 3840
Resolution Height: 2160
Texture Detail: ULTRA
Shadows Detail: ULTRA
Draw Distance: ULTRA
Anti-aliasing: HIGH
Supersampling: 4.0x
Anisotropic Level: 16
Obscurance Fields: ON
Tessellation: ON
Ambient Occlusion: ON
Motion Blur: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
Reduce Mouse Lag: OFF
Stereo 3D: OFF
 
Last edited:
That's good going to be honest, weren't people paying around £1200 (cost of 4 x 8GB 290X's) for a single card just last year?
 
Dave2150 said:
Amusing seeing the NVIDIA users have to flock to the defence of their beloved cards :D

It's unplayable on either hardware, so doesn't mean much, calm your underwear.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen any nVidia user's flocking to the defence of their hardware.

I've seen Kaap state the review is rubbish,cite examples of where other real users of nVidia hardware have achieved wildly different results to those in the review, and show how his Titan setup from what, 2 years ago, shows great performance, but he can hardly be called an nVidia user. He's about as agnostic as they come...have you seen his various PC specs?
 
```We won't see 8K on the desktop side of things for a little while yet, but it is coming. What we're going to see first, is virtual reality headsets adopting 4K and beyond much quicker. We could see 8K on VR headsets as early as 2016, which isn't that far away. For PC gamers, 8GB of VRAM isn't needed and I would not recommend 8GB of VRAM to many people. There's only $100 or so difference between the Radeon R9 290X with 4GB and 8GB of RAM, so if you're at that point and don't plan on upgrading for quite sometime, then it might pay to grab the 8GB of VRAM.```

LG already has an 8K TV and there's talk of switching to 8K soon :eek: i read about it yesterday.... it was first displayed last year

unfortunately right now it's only LG : ...it had a 100'' screen :D
http://gizmodo.com/lgs-ludicrous-8k-tv-is-too-insane-for-my-eyes-to-handle-1677790143
 
Last edited:
Mal X said:
```We won't see 8K on the desktop side of things for a little while yet, but it is coming. What we're going to see first, is virtual reality headsets adopting 4K and beyond much quicker. We could see 8K on VR headsets as early as 2016, which isn't that far away. For PC gamers, 8GB of VRAM isn't needed and I would not recommend 8GB of VRAM to many people. There's only $100 or so difference between the Radeon R9 290X with 4GB and 8GB of RAM, so if you're at that point and don't plan on upgrading for quite sometime, then it might pay to grab the 8GB of VRAM.```

LG already has an 8K TV and there's talk of switching to 8K soon :eek: i read about it yesterday.... it was first displayed last year

unfortunately right now it's only LG : ...it had a 100'' screen :D
http://gizmodo.com/lgs-ludicrous-8k-tv-is-too-insane-for-my-eyes-to-handle-1677790143
Click to expand...


thing is realistically we wont see one card that can run 4k for 2-3 yrs yet. why even do a thread article on 8k if 4k cant be run comfortably ?

look it logically 5 yrs minimum for 8k. 5 yrs in tech is basically light years. by the time that comes 4k5k8k probably wont be being used.
 
yes exactly, we're running before we can even walk..............because there wont be a GPU that can touch 8K for years :D

but i cant see us ever needing more than 4K, because Dieing Light on 1080p is close to perfection already, it just needs far better texturing and detailing and this can easily be on 4K
 
TTomax said:
50ms gpu rendertime... thats not playable in multiplayer.
Click to expand...

Playable for me, but perhaps a gpu overclock would help. It remains perfectly smooth using Mantle in BF4 even when fps drops below 60. :)

7680x4320

Excuse the handheld poor recording, but recording at 8K is currently a no go. Video memory usage was about 7.5GB. :D

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom