Netanyahu: Iran a threat to the world.

Interesting article I read the other day, maybe why Netanyahu and his zionist buddies hate Iran so much? - not sure about it though, as the 'imaam mehdi' claim doesn't fit in with sunni Islam but is more a shia claim that imaam mehdi is already here.

For centuries the Talmud has taught that ‘Jesus the Nazarene’ “was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone, was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a)”.

However over the centuries through heavy funding and manipulation the Zionists managed to convince the Christians that it is Islam that is evil and needs to be counteracted through the unity of Christian/Zionists.

Most of the Christian bible belt in America has strong links with Zionists and therefore it must have been a shock to them when a Catholic Christian Hugo Chavez made a decisive speech after his momentous meeting with Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in which he states: “For us genuine Christians Jerusalem is a very holy location Prophet Jesus will come hand in hand with Hazrat Mahdi then peace will prevail all over the world”.

The fact that Chavez hinted that Muslims and Christian will unite to fight evil is something that the Zionists do not want. They have spent billions on Islamophobic think tanks and through the media to marginalise Muslims.

An interview conducted by Ann Curry on behalf of NBC with Iran President Ahmadinejad was not aired in 2009 because his answer about the hidden Imam did not support the view that they wanted to perpetuate ‘that he will bring about an apocalypse’.

President Ahmadinejad corrected her by stating: “What is being said about an apocalyptic war and – global war…… This is what the Zionists are claiming. Imam will come with logic, with culture, with science. He will come so that there is no more war. No more enmity, hatred. No more conflict…..he will return with Jesus Christ. The two will come back together. And working together, they would fill this world with love”.

The last thing Israel would want is that Christian groups should wake up and realise that the real enemy is not Islam but rather Zionism.

Iran is not a threat to the world, nor to jews - its a threat to Zionism I would say, hence why Netanyahu and his like hate them so much. The Iranians leaders have always made it clear to the world that Zionism is the real threat.
Iran is home to thousands of jews who live in prosperity with muslims, which basically flies in the face of everything the Israeli regime tends to say these days about 'arabs and their hatred towards jews'.
 
Last edited:
Iran is home to thousands of jews who live in prosperity with muslims, which basically flies in the face of everything the Israeli regime tends to say these days about 'arabs and their hatred towards jews'.

I've made this point several times. Iran actually only is really punitive towards the Bahá'í population. That has always been the way. Judaism has always been accepted and well integrated.
 
its seriously worrying that people in power on all sides take some badly translated old books as the basis for their actions.
 
People are rude about others taste in politics, art, music, sport, the list is endless. Why should religion get a free pass ? I'm critical about religion and make no apologies for it. Sometimes my polemic nature offends, again I make no apologies. Free speech shouldn't by impinged upon just because some people might take offense. Lots of people say things which I find unpalatable but I defend their right to say them.
You can quite easily criticise and state your position with resorting to insults.

I speak in general of course, as some don't seem to be able to do this. Of course if your intention is to polemic and offensive you seem to succeed quite well. Calling people critical of Israel jew haters, for example.

Shrug, each to their own and I'm stating my position which you will obviously disagree with.
 
I've made this point several times. Iran actually only is really punitive towards the Bahá'í population. That has always been the way. Judaism has always been accepted and well integrated.

Interestingly, when large numbers of Jews moved from Iran to Israel in the diaspora, many have subsequently returned to Iran, citing they were better accepted and tolerated in Iran.
 
You can quite easily criticise and state your position with resorting to insults.

I speak in general of course, as some don't seem to be able to do this. Of course if your intention is to polemic and offensive you seem to succeed quite well. Calling people critical of Israel jew haters, for example.

Shrug, each to their own and I'm stating my position which you will obviously disagree with.

To be polemic he should be limiting his diatribe to the argument however, not the people making the argument.
 
You can quite easily criticise and state your position with resorting to insults.

I speak in general of course, as some don't seem to be able to do this. Of course if your intention is to polemic and offensive you seem to succeed quite well. Calling people critical of Israel jew haters, for example.

Shrug, each to their own and I'm stating my position which you will obviously disagree with.

No. I don't disagree for the most part. Not everyone critical of Israel is a Jew hater, I never said that, but some are. Calling a spade a spade, is often referred to as honesty. Being critical of religion is fine though and it's here where I think we actually disagree. Religion is not some sacred cow that can never be questioned or criticised like some like to pretend. In fact, the opposite is true I feel. Religion impacts all of us at some points in our lives, even heathen atheists like me. When this happens I'm not going to sit there quietly and take it up the bum while saying nothing, I'm going to speak out and oppose it. Just like I would oppose anything wrong in any other aspect of life. If people get upset, I honestly don't care. Free speech is free speech.

At least Christianity is thick skinned enough to take polemic criticism. Islam seems to go completely bonkers at the slightest whiff of disagreement. Cartoons ? :)
 
Last edited:
I don't think Religion is a scared cow at all. I don't think I've once given that impression, at least I certainly haven't meant too, just that everyone should be entitled to their own opinion and whilst it's fine to mock there's not much need to simply be rude about it.

Christianity certainly didn't used to be thick skinned did it? I think a few people have mentioned it in other threads, I certainly have; Islam needs to modernise.
 
I don't think Religion is a scared cow at all. I don't think I've once given that impression, at least I certainly haven't meant too, just that everyone should be entitled to their own opinion and whilst it's fine to mock there's not much need to simply be rude about it.

Christianity certainly didn't used to be thick skinned did it? I think a few people have mentioned it in other threads, I certainly have; Islam needs to modernise.

Fair enough.
 
No. I don't disagree for the most part. Not everyone critical of Israel is a Jew hater, I never said that, but some are.

That is because they cannot distinguish between Israel, Zionists and Jews.

They are a bit like people who cannot distinguish between Palestinains, Muslims and Extremists.
 
That is because they cannot distinguish between Israel, Zionists and Jews.

They are a bit like people who cannot distinguish between Palestinains, Muslims and Extremists.

True.

A bit like people who can not distinguish between preference or bias.

Or people who can not distinguish between trolling and promulgating an honest informed opinion.

Or people who can not distinguish between retardation and intelligence.

Analogies are fun right ? ;)
 
I don't think Religion is a scared cow at all. I don't think I've once given that impression, at least I certainly haven't meant too, just that everyone should be entitled to their own opinion and whilst it's fine to mock there's not much need to simply be rude about it.

And like I said I was more disrespectful not rude.
 
When you look at many of the claims made by religions, which they expect you to accept without question, the only rational response is to ridicule them. They are utterly absurd.

I'll post this again for those new to the thread and did a tl;dr.

 
True.

A bit like people who can not distinguish between preference or bias.

Or people who can not distinguish between trolling and promulgating an honest informed opinion.

Or people who can not distinguish between retardation and intelligence.

Analogies are fun right ? ;)

I made a valid point and as usual you come back with nothing but veiled insults, you are so predictable.

OFC I would never use the phrase bolded but nothing less than I would expect from a person with your calibre of intelligence.
 
Back
Top Bottom