The Budget 2015 – 12:30

Surely the NHS is just a part of departmental spending and has been ringfenced for the next year. It does not need to be mentioned in the budget which sets out tax raising powers and changes to taxation and investment which enable the government to spend.

God forbid we return to mind numbing Labour budgets outlining departmental spend in every sector, health, welfare, road and rail, complex redistribution through credits and return to simpler taxation and less bureaucracy.
 
On one side, whether you agree with them or not, you have people who at least sound competent and know what they are talking about...on the other you have people who, well, to put it simply...don't

The Tories have their fair share of people in the latter category. Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, even David "intellectual lightweight" Cameron himself.
 
They say that the thing about democracy is that people get the government they deserve. Well if the British people believe this budget then they will deserve what's coming with a Conservative majority government.
 
The Tories have their fair share of people in the latter category. Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, even David "intellectual lightweight" Cameron himself.

Even those outshine their opposites, which just goes to illustrate how poor Ed and his merry men and women really are. Wrong brother basically.
 
Good budget IMO, if anyone votes labour in they need their heads examined. I have no problems voting for them again.
 
Even those outshine their opposites, which just goes to illustrate how poor Ed and his merry men and women really are. Wrong brother basically.

You believe that Chris Grayling outshines Sadiq Khan? That's a really surprising statement from someone as intelligent as you.
 
You believe that Chris Grayling outshines Sadiq Khan? That's a really surprising statement from someone as intelligent as you.

It was a broad statement rather than one specifying individuals. Overall the comparison is marked and sometime quite embarrassing. Normally from the two Eds.
 
will it? it's come down massively over the last few years.

I'm in my 30's and my pension is projected to hit £1million by the time i'm 62 (i.e not state pension age yet)

I'm a very average payer into my pension, don't earn anything ridiculous but just because I started a pension at 17 years old, i'm going to have to stop paying into it, or suffer a tax penalty on it, unless they put the limit back up in the future.

I think it was said that the AA will start going up again from 2018.

And you seem to be worrying yourself unnecessarily to be honest. You're talking 30 years down the line, of course the allowance will have increased by the time you reach retirement. It's frankly preposterous to think it wont.

To be honest I doubt the Annual Allowance will even exist then and will have been replaced with something else 2 or 3 times.
 
We should be pushing ahead with things like wave, wind and solar energy before we start building more big dams and reservoirs.

I agree and I think that is what will actually happen.

It seems the environmental impacts concern me less than you, but regardless I think there isn't much scope or public appetite for more big reservoirs in this country any more.
 

That's pretty good especially if you are young and they keep 5% mortgage.

Means most people could easily afford to save and get a mortgage within 4 years.
It is an amazing incentive to start speaking early, rather than putting it off.

It's pretty amazing if you are a couple. Save £400 a month between you and get £100 bonus. On top of the 1k each initial investment.

Useless for us who have started/close to buying.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom