Caporegime
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 28,767
- Location
- Auckland
Hello confirmed arbiters of taste and other Overclockers UK forum users!
Startling news has surfaced recently - and from absolutely reputable sources like The Daily Mail and Fox News, which regurgitated the 'facts' like newborns do whole foods - that Taylor Swift has out-Evolutionised Kim Kardashian.
Screams the Daily Mail:
The rag then followed up with a picture:
People with access to computers posted their brain-wrongs:
Now, Kimmy K may have recently broken the internet but has the T-Dog now broken evolution?
I'm no Biology major but surely this is good news, right? Or am I Klueless?
Startling news has surfaced recently - and from absolutely reputable sources like The Daily Mail and Fox News, which regurgitated the 'facts' like newborns do whole foods - that Taylor Swift has out-Evolutionised Kim Kardashian.
Screams the Daily Mail:
Move over Kim Kardashian - the ideal female body shape is leggy, tall and thin like Taylor Swift, not short and busty with a big bottom like the US reality TV star, claim scientists.
A major study involving almost 60,000 volunteers rating almost 1,000 variations of the female figure discovered tall and slender is more attractive than curvy and hourglass-shaped.
It is a result which contradicts the views of millions attracted over the decades to the more voluptuous pin ups from Marilyn Monroe to Page Three Girls.
The rag then followed up with a picture:
People with access to computers posted their brain-wrongs:
Now, Kimmy K may have recently broken the internet but has the T-Dog now broken evolution?
I'm no Biology major but surely this is good news, right? Or am I Klueless?