Now, in the context of the post to which you've replied, do some simple maths and you'll find less than 5% of the readership read Murdoch press
The labour Leader thread...
- Thread starter easyrider
- Start date
Now, in the context of the post to which you've replied, do some simple maths and you'll find less than 5% of the readership read Murdoch press
Nah, Coventry is a labour stronghold, sending him there would be too kind. How about Glasgow? I'm sure they'll love him for not defeating the tories.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 10,236
- Location
- Billericay, UK
What's the Labour party if it can't take care of it's losers.
Milliband was anything but strong!
The way he claimed "Hell Yes!" underlined to the country that a choice of him equated to "Hell No!"
He was weak, deluded and clueless.
We need strong opposition, he didn't give us it.
He won't get the union vote.
It might if they wake up and see that the only way to win the next election is to go back to the center ground
There's no such thing as the union vote anymore. Each member gets one vote now.
Nothing like a bit of Tory arrogance
he's not wrong - jarvis looked the only electable one in that shower of idiots.
It changed to this in 2014:
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/05/how-will-labour-leadership-election-work
I'm sure I will be vilified for this and called a racist but the thought of a Prime Minister of Britain being called Chuka Umunna just seems, well for want of a better word....wrong. I know, I know, its not a politically correct thing to say, but to me it feels as wrong as having a UK King called Joey or Queen called Britney, or the Russian leader being called Gary Brown, or the leader of France being called Franz Von Schmidt or Spain being led by Thomas Mcleish.
Yup or that one. Like I say, I know its not the "right" thing for me to think, but I'm not going to lie about my thoughts. Just doesn't seem right. I'd say the same if William had chosen to call his son Joey, King Joey the first
Imagine if he called him Tywin.
Or if they had called him Kong, imagine King Kong the First of Britain. Would spend all his time up the BT tower
Or Barack Hussein Obama, with emphasis on his middle name, if you're very right wing and want to perpetuate the conspiracy theory that he is not a US citizen and is a muslim.
Chuka Umunna is probably more electable than David Lammy, at least he's much more credible.
Yup or that one. Like I say, I know its not the "right" thing for me to think, but I'm not going to lie about my thoughts. Just doesn't seem right. I'd say the same if William had chosen to call his son Joey, King Joey the first
Its not the right thing to say but more than that its a strange thing to say. Is this entirely based on a name? Would it be OK if he was John Smith with the same heritage? Would you feel better if he now changed his name to something that you feel is more british?
I'm struggling to see your point really.