BBC licence fee could be means tested everyone pays regardless of whether or not they own a telev

I hate adverts, I love what the BBC deliver they are one of the few quality program producers in the UK much better than the trash thats on ITV and C5 these days.

Luther, Sherlock, Hustle, Dr Who, Top Gear, Torchwood, Masterchef, Horizon, Various news programs, BBC World Service and the odd documentaries. To add to this the various radio shows in particular I am a big fan of Radio 4 and the world service.

I currently do not pay a tv licence since I never watch live television, however I have in the past and I obviously make use of the BBC service. If it comes to paying am honestly happy to pay a paltry £20 a month or whatever it is for this service and I think one of the few small traditional British organisations we have is under threat.
So despite singing it's praises you're essentially using a loophole to not pay for the content that you're consuming :confused: significantly less than £20 a month, so if you think that's paltry why aren't you paying it?
 
So despite singing it's praises you're essentially using a loophole to not pay for the content that you're consuming :confused: significantly less than £20 a month, so if you think that's paltry why aren't you paying it?

The ironic thing is, this is mainly a board that are Tory supporters preaching they have lots of money to spend and doing good things. Yet refuse to pay for a TV license or act very dishonestly to try to freeload.
 
Chopped the Ariel wire and cancelled the "license" last year.

Apart from there being nothing worthwhile to watch on that channel, I refuse to pay money to a bunch of jimmy savile's.
 
You can have a TV and not require a license, and these days with all the catch up, on demand and video streaming sites, it's not hard not to require a license.
Just watch TV programs about an hour after they are shown and save money.

Useful information. So much so I just cancelled my TV license on line. :D

Thank you Glaucus
 
I find it hard to believe all these people not having TVs. Or having TVs and some form of access supposedly not installed.


I haven't seen a house yet that doesn't have an aerial cable hidden away or installed around the back of the house and hidden.

I honestly have no idea where the TV aerial enters my house and so therefore my TV has never seen a live TV signal. The only easy way to get a live TV signal would be to subscribe to VM TV services, which I do not have as won't get value for money out of that + the TV licence fee.


Going forward I'd be happiest if they included it under council tax, so anyone who pays council tax will have to pay for a TV licence. Doing away with the specific criminal offence of not paying for a TV licence and make the enforcers redundant.
 
I agree with this. The BBC is actually a very good service, from the radio stations to the tv. I bet 90% of people on here have watched top gear, yet still say the BBC has done nothing for them and refuse to pay the license. There are a load of valuable programmes that are made that wouldn't otherwise have the funding to be possible. All of the David Attenborough nature docs, horizon etcs. They're all BBC funded. The Tudors, Rome, etcs.

To be honest, I'd much rather have a BBC than what they have in the US.
 
The ironic thing is, this is mainly a board that are Tory supporters preaching they have lots of money to spend and doing good things. Yet refuse to pay for a TV license or act very dishonestly to try to freeload.
What about the honest group who don't pay for a license as they don't need one? Never paid for a license myself and see no reason why I should.
 
Everyone calling for the death of the BBC are no doubt the same people who sit down and whinge about how the UK used to have an influence on the world. If you've ever had to watch public service broadcasting in other countries you wouldn't be so quick to decide that it needs to go. The BBC is held in very high regard internationally and we're about to totally screw it up.
 
Not sure if I believe you.

But have you ever replied and said that? We did and they stopped sending stuff.

Same for me, for 5 years all good no problems. Then after 5 years they started the harassment campaign and even after speaking to them and using the website they wouldn't stop the harassment. I used to let inspectors in my house but due to the harassment from them I no longer cooperate. I did everything they wanted and still get harassment.



I find it hard to believe all these people not having TVs. Or having TVs and some form of access supposedly not installed.
Why does anyone need a live TV in this day and age of streaming media from Netflix and others? More and more people are swapping to streaming media services which don’t need a TV license. Netflix like services are far superior to Live TV so what is so odd about millions of people giving up live TV?
 
Last edited:
I just find it hard to believe there hasn't been at least one thing he's watched live in three years. Be it a big sporting event/moment, a film/tv programme he wanted to watch, whatever. I realise people watch stuff on demand a lot, but I still find it hard to believe live TV hasn't happened once.

Not in my experience. Weird there are differing experiences on that...
I cannot speak for him but most of the shows I watch appear on Netflix and streaming services long before they appear on live TV. Why would we need live TV? With Live TV lagging behind on many great shows its hardly needed.
 
I cannot speak for him but most of the shows I watch appear on Netflix and streaming services long before they appear on live TV. Why would we need live TV? With Live TV lagging behind on many great shows its hardly needed.
Apart from the Live things, that's the priority for most people on live TV, not American series that have already been on streaming services.
 
Of course. I can understand when the vast majority of someone's viewing is done via Netflix/Amazon/etc (I have both). I'd still find it surprising if someone hadn't seen ANYTHING live for three years - it's clearly not outside the realms of possibility, but I find it hard to believe. The big thing for me would be sport - eg. rugby, football, Olympics, etc... things which are far, far, far better live (but obviously people can not be interested/might go to the pub to watch those things/etc).

Only live stuff I ever see is on the TV at work at lunchtime, in passing most of the time tbh.

Around my parents place we usually watch The Chase (Bradley Walsh is so good in this!). This is recorded though to the V+ Box.

Here I only watch streaming stuff, I don't spend lots and lots of time watching TV, maybe an episode of something per night, a bit more on weekends.
 
not relative to the OP
but to all you that do not have a TV licence, i am not asking for you to incriminate yourselves but why what do you do TV wise then?
do you only use streaming services etc
 
Please!

My parents have one. I don't watch or record live tv, or i would also get a tv licence if i did (I don't advocate avoiding paying if you do actually do these things).
 
Please!

My parents have one. I don't watch or record live tv, or i would also get a tv licence if i did (I don't advocate avoiding paying if you do actually do these things).

I can never quite understand this.
You do realize you don't need one right? you are not obliged to have one unless you get tricked into AGREEING to have one.
There is nothing in law which says you have to have a TV license.
Its a fee designed to target the ignorant and vulnerable (old people)
 
I can never quite understand this.
You do realize you don't need one right? you are not obliged to have one unless you get tricked into AGREEING to have one.
There is nothing in law which says you have to have a TV license.
Its a fee designed to target the ignorant and vulnerable (old people)

BS POST
 
Is this where someone goes off on one about how an Act of Parliament isn't law and how they live in a tent and have a large beard and are completely insane?
 
Back
Top Bottom