Or just use some common sense?
Unfortunately in my experience the law and common sense are rarely bedfellows.
Or just use some common sense?
Unfortunately in my experience the law and common sense are rarely bedfellows.
Unfortunately in my experience the law and common sense are rarely bedfellows.
I wonder if that's because you have a warped conception of what common sense means...
I wonder if that's because you have a warped conception of what common sense means...
Can you provide examples in context of home invasion, or are you just going to keep pretending the world is against you even though it's been pointed out several times that it's not?
I've done so in the past but don't have the time or the inclination to start researching this again. If you feel like taking your head out of the sand feel free to look into it yourself - a good starting point would be a case I do remember where the homeowner shot and intruder with a spear gun (he was a diver) and the CPS brought a malicious prosecution against the homeowner for that.
Edit: just remembered another one where a homeowner in Manchester I think was faced with an intruder armed with a knife. The homeowner disarmed the intruder and in the struggle stabbed the intruder killing him. Guess what, another malicious prosecution by the CPS. Can't remember what eventually happened in that case.
I've done so in the past but don't have the time or the inclination to start researching this again. If you feel like taking your head out of the sand feel free to look into it yourself - a good starting point would be a case I do remember where the homeowner shot and intruder with a spear gun (he was a diver) and the CPS brought a malicious prosecution against the homeowner for that.
Edit: just remembered another one where a homeowner in Manchester I think was faced with an intruder armed with a knife. The homeowner disarmed the intruder and in the struggle stabbed the intruder killing him. Guess what, another malicious prosecution by the CPS. Can't remember what eventually happened in that case.
This is a bit more complicated. He was actually convicted because there appeared to be premeditation (he was already in dispute with the victim and his mates, and the speargun was kept by the front door), but the conviction was overturned on appeal.
I've done so in the past but don't have the time or the inclination to start researching this again. If you feel like taking your head out of the sand feel free to look into it yourself - a good starting point would be a case I do remember where the homeowner shot and intruder with a spear gun (he was a diver) and the CPS brought a malicious prosecution against the homeowner for that.
Edit: just remembered another one where a homeowner in Manchester I think was faced with an intruder armed with a knife. The homeowner disarmed the intruder and in the struggle stabbed the intruder killing him. Guess what, another malicious prosecution by the CPS. Can't remember what eventually happened in that case.