Is Our Universe a Fake?

mxoagentjohnson · 6 Aug 2015 at 13:57

I love science <3

markweatherill · 6 Aug 2015 at 14:13

ElliorR said:
If it is fake does that mean the moon landing conspiracy nut jobs are actually right?

We definitely never went to the moon. But the moon came to us.

As an aside, the Earth is in reality flat. But the space it occupies is curved into a sphere.

djshauny1 · 6 Aug 2015 at 15:24

TwsT said:
this thread

Yup.

Nutjobs or what

dacads · 6 Aug 2015 at 16:21

Cosimo said:
They're in the universe that is two levels away from this one.

Sliver said:
How do you know this ?

There's only 3 levels, heaven, hell and earth. Earth being the lowest

So demnons must be in heaven?

Sliver · 6 Aug 2015 at 16:51

dacads said:
There's only 3 levels, heaven, hell and earth. Earth being the lowest

How do you know this ?

Grandmaster Fap! · 6 Aug 2015 at 16:55

How much XP do i need to get to the last level?

/god mode

Liampope · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:03

Caged said:
I can still see the pixels. Frame rate is cack too.

Hmmm interesting. The Planck length is clearly the size of teh pixels, and a Planck time obviously defines the max frame rate.

So definitely a simulation. Proven.

dacads · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:16

Sliver said:
How do you know this ?

How do you know that I don't know this?

willhub · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:16

So god is some spotty being behind a big screen?

Cosimo · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:17

Sliver said:
How do you know this ?

He's gone into cheat mode.

dacads · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:17

willhub said:
So god is some spotty being behind a big screen?

LOL

Sliver · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:23

willhub said:
So god is some spotty being behind a big screen?

Lots of gods on this forum then. YAY for polytheism !!!

Liquiduk · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:25

Caged said:
All the mentally slow people are written in Java.

You made a funny :d

Curio · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:46

cHk4 said:
While I'm not sure if we are in a "matrix" I know there is more to life/existence than this "reality" that we are currently in.

This is what I'm sure of as well. Personally, I think it's something so far beyond our level of comprehension that we can't even begin to grasp it. Of course, there are those on OCUK who know best :rolleyes:

dacads · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:50

Caged said:
All the mentally slow people are written in Java.

I had a hard time processing that..

Sliver · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:54

Curio said:
This is what I'm sure of as well. Personally, I think it's something so far beyond our level of comprehension that we can't even begin to grasp it. Of course, there are those on OCUK who know best

Well if you believe that tripe without any supporting evidence whatsoever, then you have to be one of those on OCUK who knows best. :rolleyes:

Curio · 6 Aug 2015 at 17:59

Sliver said:
Well if you believe that tripe without any supporting evidence whatsoever, then you have to be one of those on OCUK who knows best.

Why is it tripe? Because your tiny mind can't accept it might not know all there is to know? When we don't understand some of the most fundamental aspects of how our universe works, to confidently say there's nothing is beyond silly. My view is that there are an almost limitless number of possibilities, of which "nothing" is just one.

Sliver · 6 Aug 2015 at 18:01

Curio said:
Why is it tripe? Because your tiny mind can't accept it might not know all there is to know? When we don't understand some of the most fundamental aspects of how our universe works, to confidently say there's nothing is beyond silly. My view is that there are an almost limitless number of possibilities, of which "nothing" is just one.

You have the burden of proof to justify your outrageous claim. I'm simply calling it tripe till I see sufficient evidence. Give me the evidence and I'll happily agree with you. :rolleyes:

Xordium · 6 Aug 2015 at 18:36

If you understood as much as about science as you profess and ramble on about the you'd know full well what you ask is impossible as is your ability to substantiate your personal opinion.

He isn't deriding you for yours though is he ... as the person who went on the offense maybe you first demonstrate why his expressed opinion is wrong. I'd like to see you try without resorting to a load of wonderful a priori assumptions.

The question from both sides in impossible to answer so maybe let the rhetoric lie and accept the difference in opinion.

Sliver · 6 Aug 2015 at 18:43

Xordium said:
If you understood as much as about science as you profess and ramble on about the you'd know full well what you ask is impossible as is your ability to substantiate your personal opinion.

Read up on the burden of proof. It's not my requirement to justify anything. He made the claim not me.

Xordium said:
He isn't deriding you for yours though is he ...

Reading seems be a common issue with you. He said I had a tiny mind. That's deriding and also a sign that when using ad hominems you've already lost the argument.

Xordium said:
... as the person who went on the offense maybe you first demonstrate why his expressed opinion is wrong. I'd like to see you try without resorting to a load of wonderful a priori assumptions.

Again, burden of proof. The rational position is to reject EVERY claim till sufficient evidence is provided.

Also, Weren't you going to add me to ignore as I was too hot to handle ?