I don't think you sign up to a site and actively look for an affair by mistake.
A businessman drunk in Vegas, walking back to his hotel room after a night out, gets approached by a stunning blonde half his age with a killer body, she's an expert salesperson, grabs his arm, only $X00 for the time of his life... that is more of a mistake.
Actively seeking that sort of encounter on the other hand is more than just a mistake.
I'm not sure how that is relevant to this story or to the point I was making? I mean it still involves signing up to a dating site...
She was single and signed up to what she thought was a "proper" dating site to find a man for a relationship. Not to also have her profile on "im easy, come shag me.com" as well. Presumabel even after leaving the dating website and now in arelationship, her details are still up with her pics on some other dubious websites?
Plus since obviously records are never deleted at Madison, how many people might be in a relationship now or even married yet they might be shown as been a member of a cheaters website when it was before they ever even met?
Whilst I don't agree with non-consensual affairs outside of marriage I can't help but feel this was a very bad thing to do. People make mistakes and people make mistakes when married. Affairs happen and happen often - that is hardly new - but often they go under the notice of everyone else but those involved and stop and then life moves on for all. I can't help but feel that a lot of damage is going to come from this for events that are well past or fleeting or only conceived in the imagination.
Not cool all around. I don't see why people say well done to the hackers they aren't exactly highly idealistic here are they - vengeful if anything - Ashley Maddison have held multiple years worth of CC transactions for no reason and lied it appears about the demographic of their users and those users may not even be real because the emails given weren't verified and a load of blokes who most likely should have known better are now going to wreck their families because they couldn't keep their pants on or envisaged that situation.
She was single and signed up to what she thought was a "proper" dating site to find a man for a relationship. Not to also have her profile on "im easy, come shag me.com" as well. Presumabel even after leaving the dating website and now in arelationship, her details are still up with her pics on some other dubious websites?
Plus since obviously records are never deleted at Madison, how many people might be in a relationship now or even married yet they might be shown as been a member of a cheaters website when it was before they ever even met?
But they'd still be a bit untrustworthy wouldn't they given they signed up to a cheating website during their last relationship
that's got nothing to do with the thread - tis also suspect - what is the name of this proper dating site?
some maybe -so they were cheaters in a previous relationship - maybe they've got some explaining to do, maybe their current partner is already aware that they cheated on their ex wife
You can't be for real, signing up for a site like this is more than a mistake.
No i meant they could be on there when they are single. ANd now years later they are in a relationship. I doubt the hackers when they release the info show the last time logged on etc?
And as I said, who said they signed up to this specific site? These sites share the profiles around plus, although I havent looked, I suspect not everybody on madison is in a relationship or married or cheating?
the site is for people in a relationship
what is the name of this site your friend signed up to? AFAIK it is usually just white labels of the same company - so no I don't think it applies here. Also your friend might well be telling porkies and actually signed up to a hook up site.
No idea and was years ago. But she was upset at the time and showed me her profile on sits she "says" she never joined and asked me to help her.
And as for the other, you are really telling me all 26m members are in relationships and there arent single on there looking for no strings sex?
sorry but your analogy is rather flawed then and quite likely not as you first claimed
nope, just that people who did do that are a bit silly
right but that is going way off on a tangent - my point was that singing up for a cheating site is worse than having a one off drunken incident you didn't plan
then you quoted me with some analogy about a friend that is rather flawed and not really relevant to my post at all
I was just pointing out that
1. They may have been single when joining a "cheating" website
2. They may not even be aware they have joined a "cheating" website
That was all![]()
Haha serves em right.