I think it should be a case of punishment fitting the crime. So once he's paid off the damage, he should be charged with keeping the guy's car detailed for the duration of his ownership.
Hit him financially, his time and throw a bit of humility in there at the same time.
I'd imagine he wouldn't want him anywhere near his car again.
Surely a more fitting punishment would be some sort of community service. If he'd keyed my car I'd rather him be picking litter up from the side of the roads for 200hrs than sitting watching TV in prison.
I'm probably going to get mauled for this, but can someone explain why should the community get the benefit of this guy's reparations when it was one person who suffered the brunt of his actions?
If the guy had torched a school bus, or a community centre or some other public facility then I could completely understand the community service sentiment. However in this instance it is one person ruining the property of another, so in my opinion his remunerations (once court expenses are paid by the defendant) should go to the victim.
Hey, does the magistrate subscribe to this forum? I read that she called the perpetrator 'silly' - echoing the thread title. Well?

That was a logical step to make...![]()
It's not just 'keying a car' though, is it?
It's essentially tantamount to £8k worth of theft.
If he hadn't have been caught, the driver would be out of pocket £8k because of this fool, and probably will still be out of pocket for a long time until he gets paid back somehow.
Same with any other car that gets keyed, the car owner has essentially been robbed of the cost of repair.

so what level of property damage in pounds do you think warrents a prison sentence?
Well, considering it apparently costs £40,000 a year to stick someone in jail, it doesn't seem very cost effective to jail someone for causing £8,000 worth of damage. Make the guy pay it all back in instalments, or have him work it off doing community work for minimum wage would be what i would make happen if I was in charge.
Jail should be reserved for real crimes, not petty crimes like this. Then maybe they wouldnt be over crowded and costing us so much money.
Well, considering it apparently costs £40,000 a year to stick someone in jail, it doesn't seem very cost effective to jail
for insatnce is slashing a picture on the wall of an ikea demo room jail worthy, or how about slashing the mona lisa?