We tried women for being witches. That was completely wrong and immoral too.
Yes, because that is exactly the same as tricking someone into believing they were a man so they could have sex with them

We tried women for being witches. That was completely wrong and immoral too.
We tried women for being witches. That was completely wrong and immoral too.
What's interesting is that the vast majority of the vocal people in this thread can also be found in the migrant thread peddling their fearmongering rhetoric about the funny-speaking brown people.
As I previously stated, there's a litmus test for prejudice.
What's interesting is that the vast majority of the vocal people in this thread can also be found in the migrant thread peddling their fearmongering rhetoric about the funny-speaking brown people.
As I previously stated, there's a litmus test for prejudice.
What's interesting is that the vast majority of the vocal people in this thread can also be found in the migrant thread peddling their fearmongering rhetoric about the funny-speaking brown people.
As I previously stated, there's a litmus test for prejudice.
Vegetarianism is a choice, sexuality is not, its written in the very fibre of our being. Tricking people into homosexual acts is therefore an attack on the very fibre of someone's being. That can be deeply traumatic and lead to mental health problems and suicides.
If we don't regard sexuality as being such a fundamental part of a persons being, we don't need laws protecting homosexuality, because its just a choice. They can sleep with the opposite sex if they want to avoid stigma.
Full disclosure is the only moral option. A person ahould not be forced to compromise theit sexuality and end up suicidal.
We tried women for being witches. That was completely wrong and immoral too.
Surely not deflecting again, LFF? Don't you get tired of all this dancing around the question at hand?
If you're that emotionally fragile then you should be very careful who you sleep with. Ask someone "Have you always been a woman?" before you sleep with them.
Should it be on the trans person to bring it up, or should someone who is going to feel "deceived" actively ask?
She has not once answered direct question, she must be comfortable under her bridge.
Should it be on the trans person to bring it up, or should someone who is going to feel "deceived" actively ask?
Don't be bringing such ridiculous ideas into this thread. Of course the freak should own up to being a freak before even so much as daring to make eye contact with the alpha male.
Probably most mono-sexual people would answer one way, and trans rights lobbyists another wayAs for the bi people - no idea which way they'd swing
I know which way I'd answer, but I can't speak for everyone. Should the majority decide? Should we try to quantify the harm done by the deception? Is this even possible?
Such hostility, too much caffeine.
If you're that emotionally fragile then you should be very careful who you sleep with. Ask someone "Have you always been a woman?" before you sleep with them.
Should it be on the trans person to bring it up, or should someone who is going to feel "deceived" actively ask?
Why does the burden lay on the majority? The likelihood of them saying "no" is statistically slim.
So why do trans people get beaten up and killed simply for walking down the street minding their own business?
Why does the burden lay on the majority? The likelihood of them saying "no" is statistically slim.
it was not victimisation though, it was a nervous and superstitious society.