• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD R9 Fury X Leaps Ahead Of Nvidia GTX 980 Ti With The Latest Windows 10 Drivers

AIht08s.gif


If you can't stand to be questioned, then perhaps not posting is a good idea.
 
AIht08s.gif


If you can't stand to be questioned, then perhaps not posting is a good idea.

I don't mind answering any questions if people are really interested in the answer.

You have not been entirely accurate I notice as I see your 980 Ti also outperformed my overclocked Fury X by a fair margin in the Tomb Raider bench. What's more you were not exactly really pushing your card with the settings you used.
 
Please, Kaap. Go back and look at your first two responses and try telling me again that this is down to me not wanting to hear the answers.
You're having a laugh or a serious case of delusion. #datpride

I also like how you're bringing my scores in the TR thread into this and acting like there's some slyness going on. What exactly is your point and what do you think mine is?
 
Please, Kaap. Go back and look at your first two responses and try telling me again that this is down to me not wanting to hear the answers.
You're having a laugh or a serious case of delusion. #datpride

I also like how you're bringing my scores in the TR thread into this and acting like it there's some slyness going on. What exactly is your point and what do think mine is?

Because they beat my Fury X by a good margin lol.

I also think you need to tone it down a bit as you are not being objective.
 
Sorry what? Check yourself before you get too carried away with polishing your halo.

Trying to spin this onto me is still not working.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes I just think...are those premium 980Ti (or all those high-end 80/80Ti cards in the pass) really worth the premium comparing to the standard 980Ti in the finanial sense?

I know that "feel good factor" certain is involved, but comparing to a 980Ti at around £650 to ones that's around £500, is it really worth it in the finanial sense? they certain cost around 30% more, but they are FAR from being 30% faster...more like around 5% faster at most case performance wise, which usually would only translate to 1-2fps higher at sub 60fps?

I think by the time you get to the top end cards value-for-money and performance-per-pound are probably already out of the window.
With the 290X's there were no doubt people buying the Vapor-X and Tri-X variants of those too.
It's quite possible that people bought the Asus Fury X too despite it being almost £100 more for the same card.
 
I'm done. Kaap can keep digging himself deeper if he wants.

Googaly, perhaps I was slightly mistaken with that particular post (and I did then answer your question), but I'm not wrong in general on that point am I? :p Be honest with yourself.

You really wanna tell me that Kaap's the innocent victim in all of this or are you going to ignore what's actually happened and use an out of context quote to make a very poor point?
 
Last edited:
Tomb Raider
Max settings
1440p

980 Ti
bfr5QdO.jpg



Fury X
DM1U7b1.jpg


With the performance difference above even if I underclocked the 980 Ti it would probably still win.

I was going to post some more game benchmarks but I don't think I will as some people are not interested in any results but what they want to see.:(

Kaap, i don't know what you are trying to prove here but one thing you are saying is the Fury-X is only 70% the performance of a 980TI what you are also saying here is a Fury-X is only as fast as a GTX 970.

Now i looked at the Tomb Raider Banchmark thread here and there is a 290X in it which beats your Fury-X 1440P run FPS at a 1600P Run.

WTF are you playing at?

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom