ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.
- Thread starter RoboCod
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2004
- Posts
- 17,119
- Location
- Shepley
Don't let Kay Burley hear that.
[GD]Bloody looney-left-bleeding-heart-liberal-retard not wanting to nuke the entire middle east wiping it off the face of the earth and turning it into glass[/GD]
amidoinitrite?
Associate
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2012
- Posts
- 1,108
- Location
- Brighton
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 1,629
- Location
- Worthing, West Sussex
I've been 3 times, and my mate got in without a ticket, and this was in the FA Cup Final........
You mentioned "Pagans" but forgot about 1.2 billion people in India who have no rights under Islamic rule. Infact i am 99.9% sure they must also convert or be instantly killed.
There is also the buddhists and Shinto in China and Japan. All togeather Islam has to convert or kill nearly 2.5 billion people in Asia! Crazy! Only Abrahams three faiths are allowed to pay the Jizya and have rights in an Islamic state no?
Pagan isn't my term. I took that to mean anyone outside the Muslim faith. Is it anyone outside Islam but still of the Abrahimic faiths then?
I assume it isn't a follower of paganism, but is a synonym in this context of unbeliever/heathen/infidel?
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
Islam does regard Christians and Jews as being of a higher status than other religions. They would call them "People of the book" and give a bit more leverage. But I think that has far more to do with the practicalities of controlling an Empire which encompasses a range of faiths, because in India they did eventually consider Sikhs and Hindus as people of the book.
Not sure at the time both existed, The black cube they circle around on the Haj is basically a Pagan monument from the pagan era but Muhammed removed all the things inside that was Pagan. But Buddhism was around at that time as well i think because ancient Afghanistan was buddhist and Arabia was Pagan & Christian. You would think with such effort they put into the book they could refer to them as Pagans and Buddhists. You can still see the traces of Buddhism in Afghanistan if you look carefully but they destroyed most of it thanks to Sharia. Which is why Sharia exists and works so well.
Also this on BBC:
If that is thier attitude i would deport everyone but the Chinese, Who have not really annoyed anyone abroad in thier Thousand year plus history.
Last edited:
No they won't, that only happens in the wet dreams of the people who dream of the collapse of the liberal democracy such as the terrorists.. or yourself.
Poor dog. Apparantly it was sent up to assess the situation first.
Wth woof per suspect?
Correction Two dogs, There was a female suicide dog too.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
This doesn't come as news to me. I remember a decade ago speaking to two of the most polite and softly spoken Muslims I have known, one of who was heavily involved in the local mosque. Both spoke in terms of "our people and your people". I was very surprised to hear them say that. Now I realise that this is how many of them view things.
You are the one who applies that logic all the time, us vs them. The 'true Brits' vs Romanians, Poles, Bulgarians, Muslims etc. You're very similar to the people who worry you.
Not nice, People around here would love to brand me racist but i cannot speak highly enough of the Chinese and Indians in N.I. Never a problem Sikhs also again never a problem or any sort of agression.
They will reap the whirlwind already there have been attacks in N.I too on BBC this morning with a Muslim family petrol bombed. Soon N.I and Eastern Europe and Russia will be off-limits to Muslims.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-34840896
Presumably that's taken out of context?
How is "at war" defined? As they would argue they are at war.
Last edited:
The moment i saw ballykeel in that article i wasnt one bit surprised. In that estate, if you arent white protestant you stand a very good chance of being petrol bombed, paint daubed on your house, windows smashed etc.
Interestingly as part of software engineering we used to convert english into math mathematically proven models (i.e. each addition and captured english statement is proven to retain the integrity). I wonder if anyone has done the same with religious scriptures and attempted to (a) prove the integrity of the scripture in terms of it's statements, and (b) performed formal proof of interpretations against scriptures. With the advent of computing power someone at some point is likely to try it. Intrigued to see the result and how it would be accepted. Anyway - that's a distraction..