Charlie Hebdo Anniversary Edition

They stuck that on for a reason, to make sure folk know that they're talking about god and religion being the killer - not old men!

I'm still not seeing any logical reason to believe that is a depiction of god. It's still a terrorist with an AK running away and he happens to be wearing a symbolic hat which connotes that the person wearing the hat is privy to something. Assuming someone wearing a pyramid with the Eye of Providence is God is about as ridiculous as assuming someone wearing a pendant with the Eye of Providence is part of the illuminati.

If you have any prior known examples where an illustration of a man wearing a hat featuring the Eye of Providence was confirmed as a depiction of God himself, I'd like to see them. Artists use certain devices to make suggestions in illustrations to tell people what something is supposed to be. God is typically found on a cloud or doing something godly. Never in history has God been illustrated wearing a pyramid on his head.

That isn't supposed to be god.
 
Last edited:
Enters thread.
Reads several absurd and hilariously hopeless posts.
No need to add anything, service is resuming as usual, I'm content.
 
Enters thread.
Reads several absurd and hilariously hopeless posts.
No need to add anything, service is resuming as usual, I'm content.

Yeah madness isn't it. Next time I see someone wearing a pyramid on their head walking down the street I will start worshipping them because they're obviously god right? :D
 
False flag.

If the attacker wore sandals they would have been found 5 yards away from the scene and 2 yards apart from each other when they made their escape.

WAKE UP SHEEPLE :mad:

Am I doing it right? :confused:
 

You know there's websites out there that say the Paris Attacks were a false flag operation....doesn't make them true either just because you might link them up.

When in Matthew 16:15–16, Saint Peter states: "You are Christ, the Son of the living God", Jesus not only accepts the titles, but calls Peter "blessed" because his declaration had been revealed him by "my Father who is in Heaven"

In the Sanhedrin trial of Jesus in Mark 14:61 when the high priest asked Jesus: "Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?" Jesus responded "I am". Jesus' claim here was emphatic enough to make the high priest tear his robe

In the New Testament, "Son of God" is applied to Jesus on many occasions. Jesus is declared to be the Son of God on two separate occasions by a voice speaking from Heaven. Jesus is also explicitly and implicitly described as the Son of God by himself and by various individuals who appear in the New Testament.
 
Last edited:

There quite simply is no aircraft, and why were explosions heard in the towers before the planes hit?

So I should phone up the friends, family and current/former colleagues who worked in NY and Washington and tell them what they saw with their own eyes, whilst you know, living there and going about their daily life, didn't actually happen because a faceless person on the internet says so and has some YouTubes to prove it?

How do you think that will go?

This was my point above and here you exemplify it perfectly. You are, I can only assume, surfing the internet, contributing with like minds to try and perpetuate your odd fantasy idea of what really happened because that's what floats your boat. You will of course never hear the MASSES of people who were there, know what the saw, or like me lived and breathed it as it happened because they are all being told what to think. But you, from your computer, know the truth because you've done the research and you're no ones fool unlike all those sheep who lived through it.

Read that, digest it and see what most people laugh at you. It's not because they're idiots....
 
Back
Top Bottom