Where does this belief comes even that all new games on pc should run very fast on 1080p at max details. We're nowhere near capping image quality at 1080p with current, and I believe even with next generation of gpu's. Take a blueray movie at 1080p, and you see that we're still far away from reallike graphics, where the real cap is. Game really looks wonderfull even at 1080p.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Pure Hair comes at a very low performance hit - Great stuff
- Thread starter Gregster
- Start date
Where does this belief comes even that all new games on pc should run very fast on 1080p at max details. We're nowhere near capping image quality at 1080p with current, and I believe even with next generation of gpu's. Take a blueray movie at 1080p, and you see that we're still far away from reallike graphics, where the real cap is. Game really looks wonderfull even at 1080p.
5.3GB VRAM
What you see used is not what is needed. 970s coping just fine as well as many other GPUs.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,222
The PC version from what I have seen does not look much better than the xbone version. On top end PC's the feeling is it should run faster.
Associate
- Joined
- 4 Nov 2013
- Posts
- 657
good work AMD!!!
I am a bit lame and never played the Uncharted series so can't comment but this is by far the best looking game I have played.
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 1,379
Good stuff, I like to see AMD showing Nvidia how it's done 
Still, I believe there's some Nvidia tech in there that can be used too (gameworks stuff) so I'll try it on my 980m and hopefully it'll not lose too much performance. I'd like to run this quite tidy.
Might seem an odd question for some but does it have controller support? I'd rather play a game like this with a controller.
Still, I believe there's some Nvidia tech in there that can be used too (gameworks stuff) so I'll try it on my 980m and hopefully it'll not lose too much performance. I'd like to run this quite tidy. Might seem an odd question for some but does it have controller support? I'd rather play a game like this with a controller.
Good stuff, I like to see AMD showing Nvidia how it's done
Might seem an odd question for some but does it have controller support? I'd rather play a game like this with a controller.
Yer it does. I am on KB and Mouse but have used my 360 pad.
It's very well optimised, just like the Witcher 3; without the crippling hair effects.
The 2013 Tomb Raider which is now heralded as a great game for optimisation and multi-gpu scaling ran much much worse maxed out at 1080p
There the top of the line Flagships are doing what your high-midrange card ais doing now. Also if you're running maxed out it means you have even more advanced tech to render than the consoles: HBAO+, x16 AF, FXAA, SMAA, SSAA, Soft Shadows, and more.
At anything above 1080p, even the top dogs, and Dual GPU cards simply keeled over the died in 2013 Tomb Raider.
By comparison Rise is doing fantastically and looks breathtaking in parts.
Last edited:
Just double the lightsources for pc version, and you have a lot heavier game, which still almost looks the same. Some effects still come with very heavy performance hit.
Digital Foundry had good video about XB vs PC performance when both ran on XB detail levels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHhPOvlnLGM
Starting at 2:50
Edit:
Here is actually very good video with differences between XB and PC versions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlkYpNyKCjM
I have to admit that most of the differences you really have to look for to notice difference. They are there, but you don't notice them unless you know what to look.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 32,917
- Location
- Rutland
Does crossfire work anyone?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,192
Not from what I've seen
Permabanned
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 9,221
- Location
- Knowhere
Look in the driver thread someone mentioned using the TR2013 profile works.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 32,917
- Location
- Rutland
I just don't understand how AMD can just drag their feet like this for big titles.
That's even more inexcusable if it's that simple yet they've left it for the community to discover.
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Feb 2007
- Posts
- 15,386
- Location
- Northampton
shame Nvidia don't take note and stop over tesselating their Hair Works feature.
Ok I finally got round to giving this an albeit quick whirl and to be perfectly honest its running really great....to my surprise..what with reading all the doom and gloom on the forums. I havent looked at any framerates yet but I wanted to just get a look at the game and how it plays before looking at framerates, as I feel that sometimes that little number in the corner sometimes colours a persons judgement of how a game actually plays. What is everyone using to get framerates Fraps? or something else? I just want to be consistent with what others are using. Oh and I slammed everything up to max apart from sticking with FXAA. Shame theres no actual benchmark utility in there yet but there you go. I'm in work in about an hour but will try and post my results sometime tomorrow for info. I am guessing that Kaap has put settings into the thread for benching, so will follow those. I have really been pleasantly surprised with it so far...mind you I am only just over the first "Snow" level so maybe it gets worse later....I hope not.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,883
- Location
- Surrey
SPOILERS.
Not touching this till have some spare time this weekend Looks great.
Not touching this till have some spare time this weekend
Looks great.