First off, despite posting this in GD I’m hoping we can have some grown up discussion in this thread. I could have posted it in SC but that place is pretty dead.
Secondly, before I get started can I just remind people that ‘road tax’ isn’t a thing and doesn’t pay for roads. Roads are funded from general taxation and the ‘tax’ you (possibly) pay on your car is based on emissions. Finally, I am at various times a pedestrian, a cyclist and a car driver (and enjoy driving!).
Right, here’s the problem. Britain’s roads are too full , our cities are massively polluted and our population’s obesity levels are dangerously high. Why then, are we not promoting an obvious solution to all 3 of those problems – the bicycle! For years now I’ve been looking enviously at places like the Netherlands where in the ‘70s the government decided to pour money into building really high quality, largely segregated cycle infrastructure. As a result of that investment, they don’t have anything like the problems our country does. Cycling is just something you do to get from A-B instead solely a leisure pursuit. Children cycle to school, older people cycle to do their shopping, people cycle to work. Sounds great, but what about those who don’t want to cycle? They’re free to drive and have an easier time doing so than they would over here as the roads are quieter.
Why then are we not doing similar over here? As a nation we seem to have nothing but pure hatred for anyone who decides to travel by bike and I’m curious as to why that is. Is it just that people cycling hold up motor traffic? Building proper infrastructure that people will actually use would mostly solve that issue. Yet whenever something like that is proposed the opposition is fierce. Look at how long it took to get a couple of segregated lanes in London!
Secondly, before I get started can I just remind people that ‘road tax’ isn’t a thing and doesn’t pay for roads. Roads are funded from general taxation and the ‘tax’ you (possibly) pay on your car is based on emissions. Finally, I am at various times a pedestrian, a cyclist and a car driver (and enjoy driving!).
Right, here’s the problem. Britain’s roads are too full , our cities are massively polluted and our population’s obesity levels are dangerously high. Why then, are we not promoting an obvious solution to all 3 of those problems – the bicycle! For years now I’ve been looking enviously at places like the Netherlands where in the ‘70s the government decided to pour money into building really high quality, largely segregated cycle infrastructure. As a result of that investment, they don’t have anything like the problems our country does. Cycling is just something you do to get from A-B instead solely a leisure pursuit. Children cycle to school, older people cycle to do their shopping, people cycle to work. Sounds great, but what about those who don’t want to cycle? They’re free to drive and have an easier time doing so than they would over here as the roads are quieter.
Why then are we not doing similar over here? As a nation we seem to have nothing but pure hatred for anyone who decides to travel by bike and I’m curious as to why that is. Is it just that people cycling hold up motor traffic? Building proper infrastructure that people will actually use would mostly solve that issue. Yet whenever something like that is proposed the opposition is fierce. Look at how long it took to get a couple of segregated lanes in London!