I suspect I know the answer to this, but looking for opinions. My wife got forced off the road a couple of weeks ago by a lorry from a major supermarket chain cutting over three lanes on a busy roundabout. There was no contact, but my wife had to drive up onto the verge to avoid being crushed and in the process sustained damage to a front tyre. Since she drives our children round in this car I changed both tyres so she'd have a matching front pair and duly advised the company in question that I'd like them to pay the £110 cost for two tyres.
They are asking me to provide more information, but now I am concerned that if I pursue it this will be logged in a central insurance database and I'll be obliged to list it as a 'no fault' claim for her next renewal, thereby pushing her insurance price up for the next five years. She's not long passed her test so this would probably add up to far more than the price of the tyres.
Am I shooting the family finances in the foot by pushing them on the matter?
They are asking me to provide more information, but now I am concerned that if I pursue it this will be logged in a central insurance database and I'll be obliged to list it as a 'no fault' claim for her next renewal, thereby pushing her insurance price up for the next five years. She's not long passed her test so this would probably add up to far more than the price of the tyres.
Am I shooting the family finances in the foot by pushing them on the matter?