Strange. Your 390x is only a little slower than my Fury pro and my game is flying. Not to brag
Im sure it will get sorted.-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
DOOM benchmark Result Thread.
- Thread starter shankly1985
- Start date
Strange. Your 390x is only a little slower than my Fury pro and my game is flying. Not to brag
Im sure it will get sorted.
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,680
- Location
- The KOP
I have only had it happen twice in my 8 hours playing time.
Odd. With my 390x fps rarely dip below 70. This is with all on ultra, 1080p. Much of the time it's in the 80s / 90s. Two crashes to desktop tho.
3 times in the same time played. Seem random and always straight to desktop (365.19).
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,786
- Location
- Planet Earth
R9 390 tested with new driver and there are massive gains:
http://wccftech.com/radeon-crimson-hotfix-r9-390-significant-gains-doom/
http://wccftech.com/radeon-crimson-hotfix-r9-390-significant-gains-doom/
I'll be interested to see if this improves my frame rates as they were already at a constant 70-80. Will be time to get a monitor upgrade if so
Think there might be a problem with the 780 as well actually - testing with mine and a 970 the 780 gets around 43fps looking at the most intensive part of the first room regardless of settings from highest to low (something not right there) while the 970 gets like double that with highest settings and well over 100 at lower settings. Which would explain why there is such a massive difference from it and the 780ti in most Doom benchmarks - way beyond what there should be given how little difference there is in the cards - though that is kind of odd that it affects one and not the other.
Lets hope so. Glad some of those framerate issues have been sorted for the 390/X though. Digital Foundry has posted good video on it with comparison with old drivers and 970.
The updated driver has certainly helped my 290. Can play ay Ultra profile (+16x AF) at 1200p on average around 90fps although it jumps around anywhere between 60-120 fps depending on whats going on. previous driver I had to set Shadow quality to low to get similar fps.
Last edited:
Something really isn't right with this game at 2560x1440 on my 780 - with any settings (low to ultra) other than nightmare with VRAM load between 17xxMB and 29xxMB depending on settings - so its not like it is purely due to running out of VRAM it struggles along at 43fps (other than looking at a blank wall where it jumps to 80fps) acting like it is on the one down from max V-Sync multiplier on a 60Hz setup - however I'm fully using G-Sync with all V-Sync off. If I stick the 970 in then it jumps to around 80-120fps.
However if I drop down to 1920x1080 resolution suddenly it is running fine with 60-100fps in most cases even with all ultra settings.
Probably gonna have to play it on the 970 though I usually use the 780 as its faster in most of the games I actually play.
However if I drop down to 1920x1080 resolution suddenly it is running fine with 60-100fps in most cases even with all ultra settings.
Probably gonna have to play it on the 970 though I usually use the 780 as its faster in most of the games I actually play.
I'm getting the exact same fps on both low and ultra/nightmare settings. What the hell 
50-55fps constant, vsync and anti-aliasing disabled, 7970 @ 1440p.
I'm happy with the fps considering my 4 year old card and the high res, but it's strange that I get the same fps no matter what setting I choose.
50-55fps constant, vsync and anti-aliasing disabled, 7970 @ 1440p.
I'm happy with the fps considering my 4 year old card and the high res, but it's strange that I get the same fps no matter what setting I choose.
Last edited:
Unless you have a card with more than 5GB of VRAM that isn't with nightmare settings as it will drop you to <5fps with all the paging out of system RAM.
I'm having a similar problem where 1440p no matter settings (other than nightmare which does the above) it sits at a very laggy ~45fps (thuogh it does jump to 60-80fps looking at a blank wall so its definitely not V-Sync) but runs fine at 1080p.
I'm having a similar problem where 1440p no matter settings (other than nightmare which does the above) it sits at a very laggy ~45fps (thuogh it does jump to 60-80fps looking at a blank wall so its definitely not V-Sync) but runs fine at 1080p.
Not true...for this game, I'm much more worried about the gameplay than the frame rate to be completely frank!
Personally I don't care about the multiplayer too much, I just want the singleplayer story/campaign to be an enjoyable experience. Loved Doom 2, and Doom 3 were different but I enjoyed it with it felt like 1st person Resident Evil in space, and much more of a survival horror than a Resident Evil 4 itself was
Doom 3 annoyed me the jump scare infinite difficulty took away from what i wanted from a doom game. But I won't say it was a bad game just saddened that it wasn't the shooter i wanted it to be.