A lot of people seem to have missed the fact the 1080 in these tests was set for 100% fan speed. Unless the other GPUs tested were running 100% fan speed to reduce/eliminate throttling (esp 980Ti and TX) then the results should not be taken as accurate. Both Ref 980Ti and TX will throttle a fair bit (10% +) from max OC unless the fan profiles are adjusted to compensate. I would frequently see my 980Ti 1450 OC drop to ~1275 unless a very agressive (and unbearable) fan speed was set.
So the numbers are skewed in favour of the 1080 in this test, unless someone can verify all GPUs were tested at 100% fan speeds. This also means the 1080 was tested under unrealsitic conditions as the vast majority will never run their GPU at 100% speed. It is a good indiciation of what can be achieved with WC.
To be fair looking at the max temps of the 1080 at 100% fan, he didnt need to set it to 100%. Perhaps he does that with every overlcolcked card to remove thermal throttling from the equation. His 980ti only got to 63C in his max overclock and the 1080 was 61C. From other reviews the 1080 doesnt throttle until 82C so clearly 100% isnt needed but equally the default fan profile isnt good enough on the 1080 for overclocking either.
Yep: I just checked his Titan and 980ti reviews and the fans are set to 100% for the max overclock results in them so its a fair playing field.
Last edited: