shooting in gay club orlando

His girl? Or him? Or was it an Iranian imams advice that shooting gays would be a mercy or something similar?

IF the shooter claims he is acting in support of ISIS he is an ISIS operative. If he says he is doing it because his religion teaches him that he wouldn't be lying.

Florida isn't generally a Christian fundamentalist state and for that reason I actually wasn't surprised this may have the other face of Islam painted over it.

The details will start surfacing soon but given his known history and that he was alone I think it is safe to conclude this is not an attack organised by or with the help of ISIS or any other terrorist group. It's probably more of a Breivik style attack.
 
Why underplay this? The casualty list would be far far lower.

You're having a laugh aren't you?

There is no way one guy could have killed 50 people in a night club and injured 50 others with just a knife.

A knife can absolutely be a mass killing weapon. Look at the 2014 Kunming attack. Especially with a soft target. There are enough reports of ISIS marching dozens of civilians and Iraqi/Syrian military to be slaughtered with knives to know that.

My point is that this guy had a determination to kill a lot of people and he would have done it one way or another... with a knife, bomb, poisoning the water supply in the club etc. Let's say he 'only' killed 10 people with a knife instead - where does the blame lie then? Do we talk about banning knives? Banning guns is obviously just a band aid fix to a bigger problem.
 
What about the people that get killed with legally owned guns? Is that not a problem because it is their constitutional right?

No of course it's a problem but 3% of crimes in the US involving guns are legally owned guns. Legal gun owners are punished in response to gang violence, organised crime and that sort of thing.

It's like laws on carrying knives over here. I can't carry a swiss army knife or a screwdriver in public because kids in cities can't stop stabbing eachother, total overreaction.
 
The guy's a gun nut that sees any attempt to curb these attacks as an assault on the constitution and considers mass shootings as a byproduct of USA USA USA! FREEEDOM!
 
Why are you obsessing over the term when the meaning is clear? A total ban on automatic weapons.

Automatic weapons already require a special permit from the federal government and are not widely available, get your facts straight if you're going to take a position on this.
 
No of course it's a problem but 3% of crimes in the US involving guns are legally owned guns. Legal gun owners are punished in response to gang violence, organised crime and that sort of thing.

It's like laws on carrying knives over here. I can't carry a swiss army knife or a screwdriver in public because kids in cities can't stop stabbing eachother, total overreaction.

Do you have any reference to that 3% figure?
 
He says how horrible it is and then an hour later responds to people saying he was right. I don't see the big deal, if anything it's worse that people are using this tragedy to attack Trump.
http://s33.postimg.org/oybyiqfnz/trump_tweets.png[IMG][/QUOTE]

It isn't so bad in context.
 
This guy has been interviewed twice by the FBI and has various links to other extremists, how did this guy get a license to own a gun, and more importantly how has he slipped through and done this.

Bought them both in the last few days.
 
A knife can absolutely be a mass killing weapon. Look at the 2014 Kunming attack. Especially with a soft target. There are enough reports of ISIS marching dozens of civilians and Iraqi/Syrian military to be slaughtered with knives to know that.

My point is that this guy had a determination to kill a lot of people and he would have done it one way or another... with a knife, bomb, poisoning the water supply in the club etc. Let's say he 'only' killed 10 people with a knife instead - where does the blame lie then? Do we talk about banning knives? Banning guns is obviously just a band aid fix to a bigger problem.

The Kunming attack was 8 people with knives and killed 29 people.

But in answer to you question, yes 10 is far less than 50.

No one isn't blaming the guy himself. Ultimately he is the murderer. But we shouldn't make it easy for such people to achieve their goals, when there is little to no reason why AR-15s should be in the hands of civilians.
 
This guy has been interviewed twice by the FBI and has various links to other extremists, how did this guy get a license to own a gun, and more importantly how has he slipped through and done this.

Bought them both in the last few days.

Because gun controls are almost non existent in America.
 
Back
Top Bottom