Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2010
- Posts
- 3,034
What an utterly tragic state of affairs the PC gpu market is in that we can have a card 24-29% faster than the midrange, probably crippled fp64, cores disabled and it costs $1200. Sad times indeed
+ 1
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
What an utterly tragic state of affairs the PC gpu market is in that we can have a card 24-29% faster than the midrange, probably crippled fp64, cores disabled and it costs $1200. Sad times indeed
I wonder how much they will cut down for the 1080Ti?
If there is going to be one this time?
GPU's have been slowly crawling towards 4k for a while now. Yes, a 10% performance improvement at the top end may only mean another 5-6fps at this resolution in a modern, demanding game, but if that plus another 10% finally puts the card in a position to comfortably play it at 4k/60fps, then it means we're finally there.
But for example any games with very good graphics will probably run at 40fps on a 1080, to get to 60 you need a 50% performance increase over a 1080.
Which if SLI works in the game, you would get from two 1080s...................
At no point was I only talking about max settings. If you want 4k/60fps and max settings with every game, you'll probably be waiting a couple more years. I'm talking with a good set of settings. Usually a mix of medium/high/ultra depending on which ones are most demanding and provide value for the performance. That said, turning down settings to mostly all medium and some high is also not something I'd be willing to do to play at 4k. At that point, you're noticeably gimping the raw graphics(in most cases) just to achieve a certain resolution, which seems like a bad compromise.Yea, spend £1200 for that 5-6fps... Or just move the shadow distance slider from Ultra to Very High.
So for the 48fps game, turn down the settings a bit. 48fps -> 60fps is usually quite do-able without compromising visuals very much at all as I've been in that situation many a times.But for example any games with very good graphics will probably run at 40fps 4k on a 1080 with all settings ultra etc, to get to 60 you need a 50% performance increase over a 1080. 20% increase would get you from 50 > 60 or 40 > 48.
It'd be nice if AMD did something faster than a 1080 and very close to a Titan XP and sold it for a max of 600, That'd knock the wind out of these money grabbing gits, If they do I'll bite.
I think the 1080 will be my last card until Volta.
This is looking to be not much if an upgrade to a good aftermarket GTX 1080. I am sure the last Titan X had a better performance increase over the GTX 980.
It did, but both previous Titans were both bigger relative jumps in die size compared to their top 'midrange' brother in the range, which plays a big part.This is looking to be not much if an upgrade to a good aftermarket GTX 1080. I am sure the last Titan X had a better performance increase over the GTX 980.