Well given you still haven't quite grasped it perhaps I should have done two roll eyes.![]()
Oh you see I grasp it perfectly. You trying to insist a puppy is no more dangerous than a baby. You're just completely wrong.
Well given you still haven't quite grasped it perhaps I should have done two roll eyes.![]()
So are you suggesting we hand over some responsibility to animals now?
Oh you see I grasp it perfectly. You trying to insist a puppy is no more dangerous than a baby. You're just completely wrong.
So you clearly haven't grasped it then.hmm!
Originally Posted by Faustus
So are you suggesting we hand over some responsibility to animals now?
YES -
Thats why we destroy them.
Ok, I'll play - you're right I haven't grasped it, explain it to me then.
I always find it hilarioud how people put all the blame on the owner.
Youd never put all the blame of a criminal on their parents.
Animals can be ******** too
I wonder if it was a rescue Dog?
I have a great deal of admiration for people who take on Dogs that have been abused and neglected in the past, but at the same time, There is always the risk of them being a loose cannon, you never know what might set them off (Just like abused people really!)
A rescue dog should probably never be trusted with children or strangers.
I'm 35, my grandparents had rescue dogs, my parents had rescue dogs and we now have rescue dogs. I have a 4 year old and a 16 month old, they play with our dog, they know what is and isn't allowed and we have never had an issue.
I've been looking at the original post for this and I think Faustus in correct - you clearly appear to have missed the point Mr Faustus was trying to make.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-37129134
Absolutely terrible. The number of dog attacks seems to be rising all the time. I honestly think there should be a law in place that means that any dog that so much as nips a human with their teeth is immediately destroyed. Also there should be more severe penalties in place for the dogs owner for allowing the attack to happen.
Bring back licensing.
Gee, what a compassionate person you are. It's not always the dogs fault. Destroyed? Killed. Thats the word you're looking for. I seriously hope you don't have pets.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-37129134
Absolutely terrible. The number of dog attacks seems to be rising all the time. I honestly think there should be a law in place that means that any dog that so much as nips a human with their teeth is immediately destroyed. Also there should be more severe penalties in place for the dogs owner for allowing the attack to happen.
Same for any horse that kicks its rider?
Same for a cow that hoofs the farmer?
A loose cat recently attacked three dogs, who were being walked on-lead in the dog area of a local park, by a law-abiding citizen. The dogs apparently cowered in fear and tried to escape, but were leashed tightly by the owner and were quite savagely cut up. The owner even had to go to hospital and endure over 3 hours of stitches, due to the injuries received in defending the dogs...
You gonna put that cat to death as well?
Please say yes!!
I grew up with cats, but I still think they're selfish, evil little middle-management scum!
Because it's what people do that it reacts to.
I'm not considered dangerous, but if you **** with me too much I'll lamp you just as soon as a dog will bite.
The reason I hate Audis, BMWs and children is exactly the same...
Two of mine do that - One is just being territorial and warning you that this is his back garden. The other, like all my neighbours' dogs, just wants to say hello and make friends, in case you just happen to be carrying a freshly grilled sirloin steak that you don't want... and yes, that has happend!
In many cases, the dog is just doing its job. If you don't then try and break into the home or hurt the family, the dog feels it's a job well done!
Plenty of humans who deserve a slow, painful death far more than any dog who can't understand the complex world of humans...
Interesting concept. So if you are attributing responsibility to animals you must then consider them to be self-aware, have intelligence and able to form intent as humans do is that correct?
I didagree with the nipping thing.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-37129134
Absolutely terrible. The number of dog attacks seems to be rising all the time. I honestly think there should be a law in place that means that any dog that so much as nips a human with their teeth is immediately destroyed. Also there should be more severe penalties in place for the dogs owner for allowing the attack to happen.
Well i shouldnt say theyre on the same level as humans but yes clearly animals have the inteligence to form intent.
Otherwise how the heck do you think they form organised groups to hunt and use tactics.
Dogs aren't some random pure reaction driven machine they have a level of inteligence and reasoning.
Monkeys even wage war.
That's still a hell of a leap to then hold an animal responsible. A child isn't legally responsible in the eyes of the law in the UK until they are ten years old yet you want to make a dog responsible????