No it doesn't and if you really believe that you need to have a word with yourself. Proof is formed from evidence and, to my point, sometimes the evidence doesn't need to wait for a court of the good unless you're PC. A load of jet liners crash into tall buildings, let's not conclude the likely as a court hasn't ruled. That is really your justification in such incidents? I am all for not jumping to conclusions, but not when to most rationale minds it's blindingly obvious once you get a broader perspective from those on the scene.
Truck crashes into Christmas market in Berlin
- Thread starter thedoc46
- Start date
- Status
No it doesn't and if you really believe that you need to have a word with yourself. Proof is formed from evidence and, to my point, sometimes the evidence doesn't need to wait for a court of the good unless you're PC. A load of jet liners crash into tall buildings, let's not conclude the likely as a court hasn't ruled. That is really your justification in such incidents? I am all for not jumping to conclusions, but not when to most rationale minds it's blindingly obvious once you get a broader perspective from those on the scene.
They are not Sharia courts in the United Kingdom.
This thread has not been about the terror attack since the first few posts, unfortunately whenever a terrorist attack happens these threads follow the same route.
There is for Muslims.
You are splitting hairs. In parts of muslim society there are people who will seek to uphold the rulings of these courts, outside of English law.
No their is not... we are in England we following the law of the land
Makes me laugh that people can have such a strong opinion on a subject, yet they have no basic understanding.....
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2012
- Posts
- 2,817
- Location
- UK
Also England is only part of the uk, you're forgetting Scotland, NI and Wales
They're just English wannabees with funny accents.
Your point is?
Only by the same logic; that all religions have 'laws', Hindu, Christian, Judaism.
Though, 'law' is the wrong word to use.
Yes. In most cases it is a Sharia law and therefore the women's choice in the matter is removed as she has to abide by it as a matter compliance with the faith. I have heard many Muslim women say that they wear the niqab by choice however but I doubt this to be true as they are conforming to sharia and therefore their ability to choose has been subjugated/removed. It's not surprising to me that some Western countries have banned the niqab.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2012
- Posts
- 2,817
- Location
- UK
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2012
- Posts
- 2,817
- Location
- UK
I didn't claim there were (official) sharia courts, I've explained to you that there are arbitration services and that these can still have a similar effect. I've also corrected your statement that these have no legal standing.
Associate
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2012
- Posts
- 157
If you go by the law of the land then why do you need special sharia counclis to arbitrate on matters between muslims living in the UK.
What is wrong with the arbitration law we already have ?
Is it because the arbitration law we have treats ALL people as equals and doesnt treat women like second class citizens. ?
fiction!!!!! they're all actors, it's lies!!!!!!!
It's not law. It's a bunch of people choosing to settle their disputes according to some arbitrary rules.
It's no more law than the rules of a D&D game are law.
Important distinction.
- Status