Associate
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
****Blender Ryzen render battle benchmark****
- Thread starter FlanK3r
- Start date
Soldato
Aged X58 X5650 @ 4.0ghz
100 samples - 38.96s
150 samples - 58.16s
200 samples - 1:17:00
100 samples - 38.96s
150 samples - 58.16s
200 samples - 1:17:00
Deleted member 66701
D
Deleted member 66701
Stock 4790k
Blender 2.78a
100 Samples = 29.92
150 Samples = 45.27
200 Samples = 59.75
Something not right about those scores
Caporegime
Something not right about those scores
Done in Linux...
Soldato
I7 - 2700K @ 4.84GHz (4c/8t)
150 Samples 1min 07.7 Secs
100 Samples 44.73 Secs
If Ryzen is performing like this across the board, this will be a very interesting chip, but will have to wait and see more benches, and more costs! But that 3.4GHz chip seems to be roughly in line with my Sandychip running at 4.84Ghz (ie 4c8t = 1min 07, 8c/16t = 33.5S), suggesting Lisa Su's statement they've completely shattered the original 40% and chip is performing above and beyond this goalpost may possibly be correct, as based on that calculation, it's running about the same performance in this test as my chip, but at 2/3 of the clock speed! With boost on top these could be quite substantial CPUs.
That said, I've no idea how linearly Blender results scale.
Sounds very much like in good scenarios we may see performance right up there with modern Intel designs, we will see
150 Samples 1min 07.7 Secs
100 Samples 44.73 Secs
If Ryzen is performing like this across the board, this will be a very interesting chip, but will have to wait and see more benches, and more costs! But that 3.4GHz chip seems to be roughly in line with my Sandychip running at 4.84Ghz (ie 4c8t = 1min 07, 8c/16t = 33.5S), suggesting Lisa Su's statement they've completely shattered the original 40% and chip is performing above and beyond this goalpost may possibly be correct, as based on that calculation, it's running about the same performance in this test as my chip, but at 2/3 of the clock speed! With boost on top these could be quite substantial CPUs.
That said, I've no idea how linearly Blender results scale.
Sounds very much like in good scenarios we may see performance right up there with modern Intel designs, we will see
Last edited:
^^^^
Something not right about those scores
Now I can say it, Linux FTW
Is there another 4790 in the thread, didn't see one so no clue what win scores are.
Edit : found one on first page clocked to 4.5 (Sorry psychas)
Last edited:
Deleted member 66701
D
Deleted member 66701
Ahhhhh
And yeah, the sooner I can move my gaming rig over to Linux the better imho - for the same reason.
Soldato
Zen is smashing most of the scores on here anyway even the overclocked ones. Which makes zen even more impressive.
Soldato
The Intel chip was running stock with boost enabled.
The AMD Ryzen chip was running with boost disabled as they're still tweaking the final base and boost clocks.
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 5,849
+1 to this...
Once they nail that boost clock it will be even more interesting to see how it shapes up.
Soldato
Personally, I'm already saving a bit towards this (there's mortgages and home improvements to pay for so saving required to get things past the financial controller ). Shaping up exceptionally well so far.
). Shaping up exceptionally well so far.
Soldato
My 3770k at 4.2Ghz managed 1 minute 19 seconds which isn't bad, but its also good to know that when I do upgrade I will get a hefty performance boost
My 3770k at 4.2Ghz managed 1 minute 19 seconds which isn't bad, but its also good to know that when I do upgrade I will get a hefty performance boost
It looks like my 3770K might finally be replaced as main desktop pc come early next year if things continue to look this promising for Zen. Not used AMD on my main system since x3 720 be, which I do still have in another pc.
Anyway 3770K @ 4.5
150 = 1min 8secs
Soldato
Yeah last AMD I had was the Opteron which is what a decade or more ago.
i7-5960X 3.5 GHz, 2400MHz DDR4 = 39.07s, 150 samples oficial AMD scene
Soldato
I know most people will probably say the latter is of no importance, but there's a good reason they've not discussed overclocking on both core and memory. i.e it's non existent.