You realise the consequences of pressing that button, you want a nuclear apocalypse? The nuclear threat is there as a deterrent, so he's justified in renewing it but not wanting to use it.
I guess I was hoping for some actual policy discussion, moving on from the meaningless tabloid tattle. Instead we got Jeremy Paxman acting like a **** in order to force through the intended point.
The audience questions were alright. Would have liked to see the audience given a chance to expand on the points made though. That Mancunian chap didn't look impressed by Jeremy's response to his question.
You realise the consequences of pressing that button, you want a nuclear apocalypse? The nuclear threat is there as a deterrent, so he's justified in renewing it but not wanting to use it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.