Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Why would AMD sandbag? What do they have to gain from it?
Maybe they don't want rapid response from nvidia
It doesn't seem like they're being sensible about it, however it's the only thing that makes logical sense with the context of the size of the GPU and potential power draw.Why would AMD sandbag? What do they have to gain from it?
Bits and Chips are extremely hopeful with Vega.
https://twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/887736810625019910
![]()
It makes perfect sense, like when they had good GPUs and terrible CPUs. They are completely separate teams and architectures.It doesn't seem like they're being sensible about it, however it's the only thing that makes logical sense with the context of the size of the GPU and potential power draw.
It just doesn't make logical sense that they can get so much right with Ryzen, and so much wrong with Vega.
Bits and Chips are extremely hopeful with Vega.
https://twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/887736810625019910
![]()
Unintentional because their gaming drivers are still pants? Who knows. At least someone is still very hopeful for it haha.
Not really. The GPUs were the only thing they had going for them for the most part, at least in terms of consumer perception.It makes perfect sense, like when they had good GPUs and terrible CPUs. They are completely separate teams and architectures.
Wait till the real launch when they reveal it was the cut down vega going up against the 1080 in the demos![]()
I had the 2900xt, twice over. A 3870 mod I think it was and I still have the 4870. The connection for all those and now is the memory was kinda special, so 2900xt had that giant 512bit memory interface. I dont know it ever did any good ( I realised the game just wanted nvidia later) but somehow I thought it might. Then 4870 was the first with GDDR5 which has been used forever and now Vega is making a big deal out of HBM2 which many say is going to be a waste of time.With AMD(or even ATI) anything is possible. They had the lemon which was the 2900XT which everybody thought would be the most awesome card ever,and then when everybody thought they were finished,they brought out the HD4870,which even a week before launch nobody could figure out how fast it was.
Its more ups and down than a TV drama LOL.
Is there definitely a higher and lower card being released at the same time, even that much would be surprising to me. Maybe they want to be selling the lower card with less memory and thats the motivation for a dual release.
I had the 2900xt, twice over. A 3870 mod I think it was and I still have the 4870. The connection for all those and now is the memory was kinda special, so 2900xt had that giant 512bit memory interface. I dont know it ever did any good ( I realised the game just wanted nvidia later) but somehow I thought it might. Then 4870 was the first with GDDR5 which has been used forever and now Vega is making a big deal out of HBM2 which many say is going to be a waste of time.
So we'll see where it sits in that spectrum of performance vs expectation
![]()
Only one reason to sandbag....
Makes it easier to teabag.![]()
It's definitely possible but I have been semi on the hype train for the last few launches. This time around I am expecting the worst so won't be disappointed if the worst happens. Tbh Nvidia launches seem to surpass what I think will happen and they keep pretty quiet. When the facts arrive I have been semi impressed or really impressed until the pricing is announced. Hoping it's the same here minus the pricing.
The impossible??